Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

LGBT groups stand in solidarity with the FRC [Southern Poverty Law Center issues its statement]
Washing Post National ^ | Aug 16 2012 | Becky Garrison

Posted on 08/16/2012 10:22:46 AM PDT by scottjewell

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last
A nice attempt, but perhaps too expedient?

To my thinking, it is convenient to display a show of "solidarity" to make one's own group image appear noble -

and only after harassing and reviling people as belonging to hate groups, and stifling any words of dissent for years....Perhaps a case of "too little too late"...

1 posted on 08/16/2012 10:22:50 AM PDT by scottjewell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: scottjewell

At least they didn’t say “stands behind”.


2 posted on 08/16/2012 10:25:20 AM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yefragetuwrabrumuy

ha ;-)


3 posted on 08/16/2012 10:26:22 AM PDT by scottjewell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: scottjewell

I have no use for these groups, but the response was appropriate. If they didn’t issue such a response, we would (rightly) accuse them of being supportive.

They perform plenty of evil, but supporting FRC against direct violence was not evil.


4 posted on 08/16/2012 10:26:42 AM PDT by Dr. Sivana ("I love to hear you talk talk talk, but I hate what I hear you say."-Del Shannon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: scottjewell

The Family Research Council shooter’s actions cannot be separated from the agenda or true motives of the Homosexual Agenda Movement and all are responsible.


5 posted on 08/16/2012 10:27:49 AM PDT by Uncle Slayton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: scottjewell

Just imagine if the ideology of the victim institution and the shooter were reversed...??? The media would be on the air non-stop showing the “hate” from the Right.

The double-standard of the media is the size of the Grand Canon.


6 posted on 08/16/2012 10:28:59 AM PDT by kjo (+)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Sivana

No, of course they are doing the only appropriate thing to do in this case. I just don’t want them to get too many brownie points because I am aware of their true opinions of groups such as FRC.


7 posted on 08/16/2012 10:29:08 AM PDT by scottjewell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kjo

Hear you...and I agree.


8 posted on 08/16/2012 10:30:15 AM PDT by scottjewell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Slayton

Shhhh. don’t let the gay advocates hear you “daring to politicize this tragedy”. Brian Brown has been attacked all morning for saying what you say.


9 posted on 08/16/2012 10:32:00 AM PDT by scottjewell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: kjo
The double-standard of the media is the size of the Grand Canon.



The Grand Canon, (KJV translation)
10 posted on 08/16/2012 10:32:48 AM PDT by Dr. Sivana ("I love to hear you talk talk talk, but I hate what I hear you say."-Del Shannon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: scottjewell

They’re in ‘cover your ass’ mode


11 posted on 08/16/2012 10:34:26 AM PDT by EdReform (Oath Keepers - Guardians of the Republic - Honor your oath - Join us: www.oathkeepers.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: scottjewell
No, of course they are doing the only appropriate thing to do in this case. I just don’t want them to get too many brownie points because I am aware of their true opinions of groups such as FRC.

I agree. There was nothing else they could do. Yet, they'd love to see the demise of the FRC, so their statement has to be taken with a grain of salt. Nobody could possibly imagine that they desire to see FRC succeed in its mission.

12 posted on 08/16/2012 10:38:48 AM PDT by djrakowski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: scottjewell

This situation kind of puts them in a tough spot between banning gans or supporting same-sex marriage. Maybe if the guy had also worn a pro-Obamacare T-shirt it would have tipped the scales in his favor.


13 posted on 08/16/2012 10:39:20 AM PDT by JediJones (Too Hot for GOP TV: Newt Gingrich, Sarah Palin, Allen West and Donald Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: scottjewell
a non-profit organization that fights anti-gay religious extremism

Nice to see WaPo's not editorializing. /sarc

14 posted on 08/16/2012 10:39:26 AM PDT by mykroar (October race riots bring November martial law. Voting postponed for your safety.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: scottjewell
The shooter should have dressed himself up with a few more liberal causes to make sure the left would have his back on this.


15 posted on 08/16/2012 10:41:11 AM PDT by JediJones (Too Hot for GOP TV: Newt Gingrich, Sarah Palin, Allen West and Donald Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EdReform

“They’re in ‘cover your ass’ mode”

That’s a first.


16 posted on 08/16/2012 10:41:11 AM PDT by VanDeKoik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: scottjewell
There are unconfirmed reports that the shooting was ideologically motivated.

they are rafting on the river of denial.

17 posted on 08/16/2012 10:43:22 AM PDT by Godzilla (3/7/77)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Godzilla

yes, slightly...


18 posted on 08/16/2012 10:44:18 AM PDT by scottjewell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: JediJones

ha, that would’ve been a smart idea...


19 posted on 08/16/2012 10:45:21 AM PDT by scottjewell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: scottjewell
A nice attempt, but perhaps too expedient?

To my thinking, it is convenient to display a show of "solidarity" to make one's own group image appear noble -

and only after harassing and reviling people as belonging to hate groups, and stifling any words of dissent for years....Perhaps a case of "too little too late"...


No, this statement was the right thing for them to do. If they didn't say anything we'd be all over them for failing to condemn the shooter's actions.

There's probably some truth in their statement in that they're condemning violence. Many of the people in these groups are also pacifist types.

I'm not endorsing any of these groups or their actions, just saying that in addition to any cynical purpose to their statement (like trying to appear noble) there is probably a genuine horror at the violence of the action, if not in these groups' leadership, then at least with some of the members.

And just to throw this out there:
I know a gay man who's very in-your-face about it, and downright virulent at social events, always steering the conversation toward "the Cause" no matter what people are talking about. His reaction to this shooting was to angrily lament the fact that the guard didn't "do everyone a favor and put a few in that f***er's chest."
20 posted on 08/16/2012 11:01:14 AM PDT by verum ago (A good physical therapist is half friend, half sadist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson