Skip to comments.
LGBT groups stand in solidarity with the FRC [Southern Poverty Law Center issues its statement]
Washing Post National ^
| Aug 16 2012
| Becky Garrison
Posted on 08/16/2012 10:22:46 AM PDT by scottjewell
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-36 next last
A nice attempt, but perhaps too expedient?
To my thinking, it is convenient to display a show of "solidarity" to make one's own group image appear noble -
and only after harassing and reviling people as belonging to hate groups, and stifling any words of dissent for years....Perhaps a case of "too little too late"...
To: scottjewell
At least they didn’t say “stands behind”.
To: yefragetuwrabrumuy
To: scottjewell
I have no use for these groups, but the response was appropriate. If they didn’t issue such a response, we would (rightly) accuse them of being supportive.
They perform plenty of evil, but supporting FRC against direct violence was not evil.
4
posted on
08/16/2012 10:26:42 AM PDT
by
Dr. Sivana
("I love to hear you talk talk talk, but I hate what I hear you say."-Del Shannon)
To: scottjewell
The Family Research Council shooter’s actions cannot be separated from the agenda or true motives of the Homosexual Agenda Movement and all are responsible.
To: scottjewell
Just imagine if the ideology of the victim institution and the shooter were reversed...??? The media would be on the air non-stop showing the “hate” from the Right.
The double-standard of the media is the size of the Grand Canon.
6
posted on
08/16/2012 10:28:59 AM PDT
by
kjo
(+)
To: Dr. Sivana
No, of course they are doing the only appropriate thing to do in this case. I just don’t want them to get too many brownie points because I am aware of their true opinions of groups such as FRC.
To: kjo
To: Uncle Slayton
Shhhh. don’t let the gay advocates hear you “daring to politicize this tragedy”. Brian Brown has been attacked all morning for saying what you say.
To: kjo
The double-standard of the media is the size of the Grand Canon.
The Grand Canon, (KJV translation)
10
posted on
08/16/2012 10:32:48 AM PDT
by
Dr. Sivana
("I love to hear you talk talk talk, but I hate what I hear you say."-Del Shannon)
To: scottjewell
They’re in ‘cover your ass’ mode
11
posted on
08/16/2012 10:34:26 AM PDT
by
EdReform
(Oath Keepers - Guardians of the Republic - Honor your oath - Join us: www.oathkeepers.org)
To: scottjewell
No, of course they are doing the only appropriate thing to do in this case. I just dont want them to get too many brownie points because I am aware of their true opinions of groups such as FRC. I agree. There was nothing else they could do. Yet, they'd love to see the demise of the FRC, so their statement has to be taken with a grain of salt. Nobody could possibly imagine that they desire to see FRC succeed in its mission.
To: scottjewell
This situation kind of puts them in a tough spot between banning gans or supporting same-sex marriage. Maybe if the guy had also worn a pro-Obamacare T-shirt it would have tipped the scales in his favor.
13
posted on
08/16/2012 10:39:20 AM PDT
by
JediJones
(Too Hot for GOP TV: Newt Gingrich, Sarah Palin, Allen West and Donald Trump)
To: scottjewell
a non-profit organization that fights anti-gay religious extremism Nice to see WaPo's not editorializing. /sarc
14
posted on
08/16/2012 10:39:26 AM PDT
by
mykroar
(October race riots bring November martial law. Voting postponed for your safety.)
To: scottjewell
The shooter should have dressed himself up with a few more liberal causes to make sure the left would have his back on this.
15
posted on
08/16/2012 10:41:11 AM PDT
by
JediJones
(Too Hot for GOP TV: Newt Gingrich, Sarah Palin, Allen West and Donald Trump)
To: EdReform
“Theyre in cover your ass mode”
That’s a first.
To: scottjewell
There are unconfirmed reports that the shooting was ideologically motivated. they are rafting on the river of denial.
17
posted on
08/16/2012 10:43:22 AM PDT
by
Godzilla
(3/7/77)
To: Godzilla
To: JediJones
ha, that would’ve been a smart idea...
To: scottjewell
A nice attempt, but perhaps too expedient?
To my thinking, it is convenient to display a show of "solidarity" to make one's own group image appear noble -
and only after harassing and reviling people as belonging to hate groups, and stifling any words of dissent for years....Perhaps a case of "too little too late"...
No, this statement was the right thing for them to do. If they didn't say anything we'd be all over them for failing to condemn the shooter's actions.
There's probably some truth in their statement in that they're condemning violence. Many of the people in these groups are also pacifist types.
I'm not endorsing any of these groups or their actions, just saying that in addition to any cynical purpose to their statement (like trying to appear noble) there is probably a genuine horror at the violence of the action, if not in these groups' leadership, then at least with some of the members.
And just to throw this out there:
I know a gay man who's very in-your-face about it, and downright virulent at social events, always steering the conversation toward "the Cause" no matter what people are talking about. His reaction to this shooting was to angrily lament the fact that the guard didn't "do everyone a favor and put a few in that f***er's chest."
20
posted on
08/16/2012 11:01:14 AM PDT
by
verum ago
(A good physical therapist is half friend, half sadist.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-36 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson