haven’t looked at or for the evidence doesn’t make it nonexistent or missing or fraudulent. Look at the university library at the volumes of the publication “Evolution” alone ... The nature of science is extrapolation."
Your implication is that the evidence is the existence of the books on evolution. So may I extrapolate the existence of 100s of thousands of books in the library make them evidence of their fact too?
Wrong. My implications is that if he thinks we are not “drowning “ in information on the subject it is because he has FAILED to look.
Wrong. My implications is that if he thinks we are not “drowning “ in information on the subject it is because he has FAILED to look.