Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: JustSayNoToNannies

it is ALREADY grounds to revoke a license and where actual impairment is at issue physicians are OBLIGATED to report the impairment. it is the law NOW.

So if a physician considers the use an impairment then that person MUST be reported. period.

anyone who is perscribed pot is INELIGIBLE to hold or maintain a cdl. it is the law.

use pot you can’t drive commercially (or even off duty),

use pot and a your regular non pothead doctor may have the affirmative duty to report your use of pot as an impairment to safety.

read.


32 posted on 08/07/2012 2:39:25 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: longtermmemmory
That doesn't add up to your proposal that "any perscription [sic] should have an instantaneous medical suspension of all vehicle licenses." But you knew that, or you wouldn't have said "should." So you're still not making a coherent point.
33 posted on 08/07/2012 2:50:42 PM PDT by JustSayNoToNannies (A free society's default policy: it's none of government's business.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson