To: brent13a
I can only assume this also includes child prostitution, or including that is the next logical step for the UN. I guess child prostitution should be up to the individual sovereign states as well. This UN agreement is against child prostitution and wants it outlawed.....see section 3.2.5
To: trailhkr1; philman_36
This UN agreement is against child prostitution and wants it outlawed.....see section 3.2.5
For now.
But as we all know massive government bureaucracy leads to the same old slippery slope. Once one is legalized, the others fight for the same legitimacy and 99% of the time they end up getting it.
If the UN wants to gently nudge our sovereign states to open the discussion under our Federal and State Constitutional powers then so be it. However, saying that we should bow to the UN because it sort of works for one state in the USA.....none of that makes sense.....the UN doesn't care about our Federal or State Constitutions nor our Federal or State sovereignty.
I don't understand how someone could endorse a libertarian ideal of state sovereignty but be OK having it's implementation forced by international fiat by a progressive international bureaucracy that has no respect for said sovereignty.
26 posted on
07/25/2012 6:24:47 AM PDT by
brent13a
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson