well, one thing is for sure- (see post 315) Madelyn was real, and she left real money to barack obama jr.. - when someone leaves that kind of money you are most likey a blood relative.. I dont know if Maya recieved anything????.. The only thing i really know for fact is the BC he posted is forged, and good evidence that he may have been born in Kenya..You could be right about stanley ann dunham losing custody of Barack jr. around 1973 according to the 1 dependent on the tax records though, because he was also a soetoro at the time according to his school records in indonisia- the only reason for him not to be on there would be “she abandoned him”, “lost custody of him”, or “ he doesnt belong to her”..- I believe she could have lost custody of him because she was not a decent person according to the nude photos- in fact she was nasty and probally a prostitute or something
There is no law against a prostitute having children that I am aware of. It’s not a question of morals, it’s a question of whether she was ever in a relationship with the kenyan, and until you see a copy of the Will, I suggest you take the reports of an inheritance with a bucket of salt. On the other hand, Mr & Mrs Dunham might well have been paid up front for their guardianship activities, and the bequest might represent what was left over after he left Hawaii.
The Central Park fake image exists for a reason. We are expected to believe the Dunhams and zero still had a relationship, which I doubt.
A young man whose true grandparents have half a million in Bank stock don’t let their grandson spend the night on a fire-escape and wash at a fire hydrant the next morning. There’s reason to take it that when he found out who he was after he graduated (when he found his birth certificate according himself) the elder Dunham/zero relationship broke down.
That is not correct. I am a retired CPA. A tax return is not a custody document. It is a form on which you are entitled to claim exemptions for LEGAL DEPENDENTS ONLY either in your household or for whom you provide over 50% of support. A dependent can only legally be claimed on one return (absent a rare court order). Because Barry was living with and being supported by his grandparents in 1973, only they would be legally entitled to claim him as a dependent child on their tax returns, NOT Lolo and Ann.
I have seen no documentary evidence that Ann gave up child custody of Barry and at the time of her divorce from Lolo, Barry was still listed (unnamed) as a "child of the marriage over age 18" (who could only have been Barry).