I had ruled out the delayed birth certificate..but it does say affidavit signed by the parent((S)). That would mean both parent’s signature. You may be on to something....1971 visit????
I had ruled out the delayed birth certificate..but it does say affidavit signed by the parent((S)). That would mean both parent’s signature. You may be on to something....1971 visit????
_______________________________________________________________________
My guess is that everything was re-baselined in terms of documentation in 1971. Regardless of the facts, lack of father being named in 1961, etc. etc.
Again, it is obvious Obama SR was NEEDED for something. Affidavits stating the child was his, claiming the child to terminate Lolo Soetoro as father and terminated Indonesian citizenship, etc. etc.
But he had a role to play there and not just drink with his ol’ buddies.
Remember Obama SR never signed or acknowledged the divorce in 1964. I believe it has been shown it was ‘knock and nailed’ at his address at the time and after a period of no response the divorce was completed without his signature or acknowledgement. Beyond the known fake BCs this is the first appearance in formal records for “Barack Hussein Obama II”. A one way divorce that seems to be leveraged almost soley to establish a name for the child. Again, remember there was no marriage certificate. There likely was no real marriage. This action would give a legally fatherless child a father.
Now for some off the cuff conjecture....
Why would a one divorce be done where there likely was no marriage to start with?
- Give a fatherless child a name. Or give a child whose father is famous communist poet a name. Either explains the ‘9’ Not Stated entries in source image of the LFBC forgery.
Why is Obama SR later needed in person?
- He is the legal father of record but there is nothing with his signature or acknowledgement of that fact in 1970 or 1971. With a guardian/citizenship transfer for Barry in the works the documentation is getting more scrutiny. So the paperwork has to be ‘tightened up’. And again as of 1971 the past is rewritten - no matter what it really was. Using Hawaii’s ‘just sign here’ BC laws all is legally good. And the transfer of Barry from Indonesia to Hawaii can happen - for whatever reason it happened.
Anyone who works with orphans or ‘at risk’ kids will tell you how easy it is to get judges and courts to to approve records updating when it ‘benefits the child’ . And in Hawaii it was probably even easier.