Posted on 07/19/2012 5:28:21 PM PDT by Seizethecarp
It now appears the worst fears of the U.S. Constitution’s framers were well founded as investigators working on behalf of the ongoing investigation into the Constitutional eligibility of Barack Obama have found yet another lead in a growing mountain of evidence within the public records section of the British National Archives indicating the occurrence of at least four vital events registered to the name of Barack Obama, taking place in the British Protectorate of East Africa (Kenya) between 1953 and 1963, including the birth of two sons before 1963.
The record of birth of a second son prior to Kenyan independence is significant because biographical information about Obama’s family indicates Obama Sr. fathered only one other son prior to Obama II’s birth.
The books containing hand written line records of vital events attributed to Obama are contained in Series RG36 of the Family Records section in the Kew branch of the BNA. The hand written line records first discovered in 2009, indicate several events were registered to the name Barack Obama (appears to be handwritten and spelled “Burack” and “Biraq”) beginning in 1953 and include two births recorded in 1958 and 1960, a marriage license registration in 1954 and a birth in 1961. Barack Obama is said to have died in 1982 and had married at least once more in Kenya and had at least one more child in 1968, but no record of these were found in the BNA because, according to the Archives’ desk reference, the events occurred after Kenya achieved independence from British colonial rule in 1963.
To date, Barack Obama II is the only known alleged son of Obama Sr. born after 1960 and before the independence of Kenya became official in 1963.
(Excerpt) Read more at thedailypen.blogspot.com ...
Right, what you said...and now we know who their little boy is. We’ll get to his old man later. That’s after everyone gets a chance to catch up and work out who the name BHO2 originally belonged to.
Nice collection you got there, they have to keep changing the rules to fit the crime, right?
AN ABSTRACT.
That’s a bit of information from here and a bit from there and a bit from somewhere...all gathered up and placed on one piece of paper.
You get LAYERS.
Really???
Speaker Boehner said: “If it’s good enough for Hawaii, it’s good enough for me!
A little later Michelle Bachmann was asked the same question and she pulled out her Stradivarius and played the same tune inside the halls of CONgress with very good accustics!!
You ask any CONcritter that question, including Allen West, they will ALL side step the question and distract you, enabler, YES. If this possum is not REMOVED before Nov. 6th. you will have NO Republic of the United States of America left, and someone said 230+ years ago: “If you can keep it.” Sharia Law will then substitute our Constitution. And WORDS will NOT do it either!!!
IIRC you claim they were both born in 1961 and are within months of being the same age in the picture when they are obviously around two years apart. I doubt any FReeper will agree with your assessment that they are toddlers of nearly the same age. The “dark boy” (actually Mark) is obviously way older than a toddler seeming to be at least age 4.
I don't believe you can come up with a date and a location for the pictures of the two boys that can be reconciled with even your own narrative.
If you are confident of what you are showing me and confident in your narrative please indulge me and inform the FReepers and lurkers of the following:
1. The approximate date the photo of the two boys you claim are Barry and Roman was taken
2. The location where the picture was taken
If I am wrong, as you say, also please provide:
3. The date of the family photo with Senior, Ruth, the boys you claim are Roman and Mark
4. The location of the family photo with Senior, Ruth, and the boys you claim are Roman and Mark
Upthread I have given my estimates for these dates and locations implied by your narrative and they don't work, IMO. Maybe you can improve on my guessing as to the dates and locations for your narrative and prove me wrong in the process.
Krustjow and many befor him as well!!!
I have taken care of many, many children. The two boys in the photo are not “obviously about two years apart”. IMHO they could be between 6 months to a year or so. Children grow at different rates. It isn’t “obvious”, it’s murky.
IOW, all we have discussed on your thread that have stirred up some souls are nothing but herseay, hmmm. And then you tried to shut up old timer Fred Nerks. I wish BP2 was still active!!!
It’s an abstract sort of like how Jackson Pollock was an “abstract” artist.
Here’s an interesting article, just posted today on FR. In Maraniss’ own words. Since he is an 0bama suckup, why should anything in his book be taken at face value, unless there is corroborating non-0bama suckup sources?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2911536/posts
Opinions
What drives the Obama doubters and haters?
By David Maraniss,
David Maraniss, an associate editor of The Post, is the author of “Barack Obama: The Story” and “First in His Class: A Biography of Bill Clinton.” This is part of an occasional series on the 2012 presidential candidates’ political lives.
There are Obama doubters and haters out there who claim with righteous anger that they are “vetting” the president, something they say the mainstream media never did. Some of them have said that my new biography — unwittingly, they argue, for I am too dumb to understand what my research has unearthed — proves that Barack Obama’s defining memoir is phony and that his entire life is a fraud. My intent is not to defend Obama or his book; he can take care of himself, and I have my own questions about “Dreams From My Father,” which I make clear in my book. But when comparing the liberties Obama took with composite characters and compressed chronology — which he acknowledged in the introduction to his memoir — to the stretches his most virulent detractors have taken in building their various conspiracies, I believe that they are the frauds and fabricators.
And for the whole article, starting with a notorious photoshopped photo of Zero and his “grandparents” on that bench in Central Park:
I wouldn’t even bother trying, everything you write tends to sound like AND WHEN DID YOU STOP BEATING YOUR WIFE.
But there is something I want to ask you. Backthread it seems like you were saying that I, personally, gave a name to the woman whom DrRJP shows morphing with our erstwhile hero. (Not MX as you identified him as) she might also be the same woman featured in the TRIO composite posted by PhilDragoo. As neither myself, nor DrRJP, nor Phil named her, I would appreciate you setting it out for the record, just where you got her name?
I think I recall the most I ever said about her was that she was a relative of the baby-sitter and her father was connected to The American University of Beirut.
Dr RJP says she’s a Lebanese Christian. No name. What’s your source?
I'm not sure you understand hearsay, and perhaps I didn't explain it well.
Hearsay evidence is evidence that you yourself did not hear or see yourself and it is inadmissible in court in almost all cases because an accused has a right to cross-examine an accuser.
What Fife heard the drunken woman say to him was hearsay. Fife cannot be a witness. What the drunken woman told Fife was probably hearsay for her as well because she wasn't actually involved in making Barry a mole, IIRC, but only know from others telling her that it was being done.
I am NOT accusing Fife of lying. I find the story to be credible, but it can't go anywhere near a courtroom. It is like the HI election clerk, Adams, whose affidavit said “My supervisor told me it was general knowledge there was no BC for Barry.” This, too, is double hearsay. Adams had no personal knowledge (first degree hearsay) and he doesn't claim his supervisor had personal knowledge or access to the HI DOH archive, but only had general knowledge that Barry had no BC (second degree of hearsay).
The aricle uses the photoshopped image from Central Park and finishes on the RACE CARD.
Very impressive, blech
nice find.
Fred,
I don’t know where he got his information, but there is some really good facial recognition software out there on the net (I’m sure that SC does not use it). It could be quite illuminating to search the web for matches using this software — I may even give it a try myself.
If you can't provide the dates and locations, it will be obvious to all FReepers and lurkers that you simply cannot reconcile any combination of dates and locations for these photos with your narrative that begins with Malcolm X and Valerie Sarruf and ends with Roman Obama living with BHO Sr. and Ruth in Nairobi for the reasons I have given.
“There are Obama doubters and haters out there who claim with righteous anger that they are “vetting” the president, something they say the mainstream media never did. Some of them have said that my new biography — unwittingly, they argue, for I am too dumb to understand what my research has unearthed — proves that Barack Obama’s defining memoir is phony and that his entire life is a fraud. My intent is not to defend Obama or his book; he can take care of himself, and I have my own questions about “Dreams From My Father,” which I make clear in my book.”
Maraniss is hardly an Obama suck-up. Maraniss destroyed the “Dreams” narrative over and over, as he clearly states above.
Speak for yourself, not "all freepers and lurkers". Please.
1. The approximate date the photo of the two boys you claim are Barry and Roman was taken
The two little boys are zero and BHO2. They are approximately between two and three years of age. I refer to them as just out of toddler-hood. Zero, not long before is seen in the toddler image with the hammer, and he appears to have been wearing training pants, so he was then not totally toilet trained. The dark boy is several months older.
2. The location where the picture was taken
Somewhere where they were together, most likely in Hawaii. However, WHERE they were isn't really that significant, is it? What's important is that Mark made a boo-boo placing an image of zero and BHO2 on his webpage, realized he had made a mistake, decided to change their appearance, and when that was made a mockery of, which it was, he removed the image altogether.
If I am wrong, as you say, also please provide:
I am not your lacky, please note, I decided to respond for the sake of the readers.
3. The date of the family photo with Senior, Ruth, the boys you claim are Roman and Mark
She's holding her chinless wonder of a son named Mark, he appears to be a toddler still. You work it out. And BHO2 is now old enought to reach to her waist.
4. The location of the family photo with Senior, Ruth, and the boys you claim are Roman and Mark
Why do you insist on calling him Roman? As the son of the kenyan born in the US, and named after his father, you must have come to the realization by now that this child was BHO2. When he chose to use the name Roman is unknown. Either call him BHO2 or refer to him as the dark boy. He doesn't show up as Roman until the article about Roman Obama at the Lumumba University in Moscow...which article, btw, was reprinted in a Chcago paper a few days later WITH THE NAME REMOVED AND THE NAME OF ANOTHER STUDENT SUBSTITUTED.
Third World Students Stranded in Russia. LINK
When Yadate Debrework came here six years ago to study international law, the world had barely heard of Mikhail Gorbachev, there was still a country called the Soviet Union, and the young Ethiopian had enough money to survive. "I can't even afford to go home," said the 31-year-old graduate student. He will complete his studies at the Patrice Lumumba University this summer and literally does not have the fare back to Ethiopia.
now compare that with the original article:
“When he wakes up, he’ll have one of those neurological episodes he has when he’s cornered and he’ll stop.”
It should be easy for you, a person who presumably does NOT have neurological episodes, to identify the dates and locations of the pictures of the boys, right?
Dang! Time for my next neuro-mandated nap!
OK, I gotcha now, you are a threatening scumbag. And dangerous. I just wanted to hear it loud and clear.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.