Utter Nonsense.
The only way you repeal the 2nd Amendment is by force of arms (use of military troops. The citizen of this Country are not going to willingly comply with a UN treaty. The Police are not capable of taking our weapons from us and I truly believe here would be open revolt if the military was ordered to do so. So what> The UN is going to send UN troops in? Get serious.......
2nd Amendment of what I ask?
“Utter Nonsense.
The only way you repeal the 2nd Amendment is by force of arms (use of military troops. The citizen of this Country are not going to willingly comply with a UN treaty. The Police are not capable of taking our weapons from us and I truly believe here would be open revolt if the military was ordered to do so. So what> The UN is going to send UN troops in? Get serious.......”
The UN is simply NOT the strong-arm organization that it claims it is.
England never had troops going house to house to lose their right to arms. They lost it gradually, bit by bit, through regulation. This essay explains it fairly well:
GUN REGISTRATION IS GUN CONFISCATION
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2608785/posts
“Utter Nonsense.
The only way you repeal the 2nd Amendment is by force of arms (use of military troops. The citizen of this Country are not going to willingly comply with a UN treaty. The Police are not capable of taking our weapons from us and I truly believe here would be open revolt if the military was ordered to do so. So what> The UN is going to send UN troops in? Get serious.......”
Did you read the post?
Obama would sign it and we are bound until the Senate REJECTS it, not just parked until the RATIFY it
So Reid won’t vote on it... and if Obama won re election they’ll incrementally inflict as much as they can get away with-
I’d rather err on the side of caution and vigilance than fear appearing to be an alarmist, you can be paranoid enough with this vile regime!