I do not need to know more about WHY Roberts chose to break his vow to God and rewrite legislation and ignore an easily understood document like the Constitution. He decided to do so. That in and of itself, is reason enough to hold this jack wagon up to an impeachment. Regardless if the Senate would ever convict and remove.
The citizenry has every right to expect the SCOTUS to rule in a CONSTITUTIONAL and, possibly more importantly, a CONSISTANT manner. The need for reams of paper to put to bed the issue that the Federal Government does or doesn't have the right to force a citizen in a free society to engage in economic activity with a third party or face a penalty/tax/tax/penalty, Whatever, doesn't take a JD from HAAAAAAAARVARD or even a law degree. It is COMMON SENSE. That is why so few lawyers and other practitioners of the lying arts can't figure it out. That is also why, since this morally bankrupt Chief Justice has decided that the government CAN cause a person to be penalized/taxed for NOT doing something, it is reasonable to assume that we no longer live in a free society.
Your desire to somehow PROVE that he did anything reasonable, or even sane, in his ruling is tiring.
Simply calling someone ignorant doesn't make it so, but judging from your history on this site, there seems to be a consensus that you are indeed an asshole, ignorant or otherwise.
These are your words...I could always read up and become more learned.
You could, but you won't.
Keeping yourself ignorant allows you to continue in the same manner you are now.
Simply calling someone ignorant doesn't make it so...
Nope, your own words and inaction make it so. It's your own doing, not mine.
...but judging from your history on this site, there seems to be a consensus that you are indeed an asshole, ignorant or otherwise.
Oh, my! I'm supposed to be worried about some nebulous "consensus"?
I'll not be Delphi'd! (Using the Delphi Technique to Achieve Consensus)
Not working on me, Mr. Facilitator.