Any Vote That Isn't For Romney Is Effectively A Vote For Obama (pic)

The Looking Spoon ^ | The Looking Spoon

[Girlene]

If the founders had held the line on slavery, millions would have been freed of the scourge of slavery. At least 600,000 wouldn't have died in bloody battle in harsh conditions.

Well, certainly, but that was not the choice. The choice was stick to the principle of no slavery and never form a country or give up on that principle for the time being to establish a United States, free from Britian. They chose the second.

I was referring to WWII with the "millions more lost or enslaved" comment.

[JRandomFreeper]

The choice was stick to the principle of no slavery and never form a country or give up on that principle for the time being to establish a United States, free from Britian.

There were NO other choices whatsoever? Really?

Even a frigging cook can see some other options.

Try again.

/johnny

[pfflier]

I was not referring to the election outcome.

[JRandomFreeper]

Don't ever expect me to approve of evil. Ever, even temporarily. Or endorse it. Ever. Not slavery, as still exists, or abortion.

Never, ever.

/johnny

[fatnotlazy]

“Enjoy that warm tingly feeling down your leg after voting for barky.”

***

Now you’re being childish.

Grow up.

[JRandomFreeper]

Which outcome is that, pray tell?

/johnny

[Principle Over Politics]

So if I don’t vote for 0bozo, is that a vote for Willard? Sheesh...go jump in a lake

[Girlene]

lol, I’m not confused.

Here’s another example, just for kicks.

Several posters on this thread are claiming they won’t vote for Romney based on their principles....they cannot vote for someone they think is pro-choice, or somehing else. (I’m generalizing here). I call you guys the conscientious objectors in this battle. Fine. There will always be some. Buuuuuut, if we were all conscientious objectors we’d get creamed in each and every battle. Some of us have to get bloody and fight by actually voting...not “not voting”. It would help to have more of us than them (liberals) in this battle. We’ve got a long ways to go in this war, but first we have to win THIS battle.

[pfflier]

The complaining one.

[JRandomFreeper]

So, girl, what are you guys going to call yourselves after the election?

Because you can't call yourself conservative if you are willing to approve of slavery (you did, upthread, to get what you wanted), or killing babies in the womb.

/johnny

[JRandomFreeper]

I expect I'll be rubbing it in if Willard wins. Every time he goes liberal.

Get used to it.

/johnny

[pfflier]

I rest my case.

[jonrick46]

You nailed it in every way my FRiend. We also have to include Steve Schmidt who was too inept and unqualified to run a presidential campaign. I have great contempt for Steve Schmidt. I am sure the failures of McCain’s campaign came from Schmidt’s direction.

[Girlene]

That’s what they did. The southern states refused to sign the declaration when it included Britian’s importating their slave trade as on ef the colonies’ grievances. So out it went.

[JRandomFreeper]

We each make our bed, we must each lie in it.

Enjoy.

/johnny

[JRandomFreeper]

That was very close to being in the American English language.

Care for a do-over?

/johnny

[Girlene]

I’m going to call myself tired trying to keep up with your logic.....changing my statements into something I never wrote....all while you throw in little insults. lol, you might not agree with me, but attributing me with things I never wrote doesn’t accomplish much.

I gotta hit the hay....later.

[JRandomFreeper]

I quote:

"The choice was stick to the principle of no slavery and never form a country or give up on that principle"

That's approval of slavery. You can give up on whatever principles you claim to hold. I won't.

/johnny

[EternalVigilance]

Dumb analogy. You obviously don’t know the difference between conscientious objectors and fighters who refuse to be quislings.

[KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle]

{^) There'll be all kinds of electoral vote count hooptidoodle in the response, which will appear to have merit, except that it ultimately boils down to the bitter truth: the guy who loses will have lost becaue not enough people voted for him. The loser's side, be it Obama's or Romney's, will squawk that "you didn't vote for my guy so it was the same as voting for the other guy," but ultimately, will boil down to, simply ... their loser didn't get enough votes.

Only need one side of the paper to figure that one out.

Purely pitiful, ain't it...? ;)