Why do you think the US would use nukes on Texas? Didn’t use them in Korea, Vietnam, Iraq, or Afghanistan. any one of which would had gotten more support than nuking fellow North Americans.Another thing to think about is the fact that most of the strategic petroleum reserves are in the salt domes here in Texas. The US wouldn’t want to blow that up, for a number of reasons. My personal opinion, there wouldn’t be a war at all. Lots of people running their mouth,and in the end they’d give Texas it’s sovereignty. For one thing, it isn’t like the whole rest of the country would be against us. What about Oklahoma, Kansas, Arizona, Wyoming, and several others? They might stay in the US for the time being, but they’d be mostly sympathetic with Texas. It would be a real mess for awhile, but freedom is always worth it.I’m getting a little old, but if I knew that this could be a better place for my daughter, and she wouldn’t have to pay half her earnings to support some welfare momma squirtin’ out 2 kids a year, or giving special benefits to some dude who wants to make love to another dude’s exhaust pipe, it just might be all worth it.
My state (North Dakota) is the largest producer of wheat in the country.
We get over $1 Billion a year from the federal government in agricultural subsidies.
So why would the people of the major agricultural states (North Dakota, South Dakota, Montana, Oklahoma, Idaho, Illinois, Iowa, Nebraska, etc) side with Texas?
All of these states are getting agricultural subsidies from the federal government.