Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama Campaign Gears Up For Massive Voter Fraud
Western Journalism ^ | 7/7/2012 | Kris Zane

Posted on 07/07/2012 4:15:06 PM PDT by IbJensen

Charlie Rangel, flanked by high-level Democrats, recently strutted up to the microphone declaring himself the winner against Hispanic opponent Adrian Espaillat in the race for New York’s 15th Congressional District. At least until his opponent discovered that polling places were illegally asking voters for ID, were turning away pro-Espaillat voters, and even were reporting zero votes to suppress the counts.

What a shocker: Charlie Rangel was involved in massive voter fraud and intimidation.

No one is surprised, really. Far-Left “Progressive” (i.e., socialist) Democrats have been involved in these tactics for years. Like Obama, Rangel was endorsed by the Democratic Socialists of America in 1996. Like Obama, Rangel has deep ties to the unions and Alinsky (ACORN-style) groups that are the shock troops of voter fraud.

Imagine if the tactics used in the Rangel/Espaillat race were used on a national scale. Where the entire Democratic National Committee (DNC), all the major unions, and all the “Progressive” groups were engaged in a massive voter fraud and voter intimidation campaign.

Well, we don’t have to imagine it as this is what occurred in 2008 with Obama supporters during the Democratic Primary, as countless poll workers, Hillary Clinton supporters, and simple bystanders extensively reported.

And the mainstream media did what they do best and ignored it.

Now imagine all the previous groups banded together with the power of the Obama presidency, the power of the DOJ, the power of all aligned city governments, etc., involved in a repeat of what we witnessed in 2008.

We will have an attack on our election process that makes the ballot stuffing and intimidation of 2008 look like child’s play.

Do we think Eric Holder is running around the country blathering about the evil of voter ID laws because he cares about minority voters? Holder is nowhere to be found when Espaillat, a Hispanic, is calling foul.

The Obama campaign and Eric Holder’s DOJ are gearing up for a tidal wave of voter fraud and intimidation that will drown this country with a corrupt election beyond resuscitation.

Both Obama and Eric Holder need to be impeached before this can occur.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: esmit; evilobamaregime; getbooutofwhitehut; phonypresident
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 last
To: Eccl 10:2

“Many Conservatives on here are not voting.....That’s because they are decidedly NOT Conservatives.”
**************************************************************************
I happen to agree with you. Anyone who does or says ANYTHING that contributes in any measure toward an Obama victory in November is selling out the Republic, IMHO.

He wasn’t my candidate but I will be voting for Romney (even though in my current residential state of Maryland it may make no difference in who picks up the State’s electoral votes). I’ll be voting either early or by absentee ballot so that, on election day, I’ll be free to be up in Pennsylvania as a volunteer helping to ensure that Voter ID provisions are properly complied with & correctly enforced. We ALL need to go “all in” on this election—at all levels whether local, state or federal.

Who knows, maybe part of my contribution this year will be getting my ass kicked by frustrated “voters” as I leave my assigned precinct after the polls have closed. That would be a small price to pay.


41 posted on 07/08/2012 12:28:53 AM PDT by House Atreides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: House Atreides

This is a perpetual and very hot debate you’ve waded into. Take a risk on Mitt, or make a protest vote. (Nobody here has said vote directly for Barack.) I’m going to the polls with a clothespin: Mitt could be influenced. Obama is as obdurate as a hunk of flint.


42 posted on 07/08/2012 12:32:59 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (let me ABOs run loose, lew)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
I guess I'm also going to vote for not the Obama. I hope the party knows this is the last time ever I vote for a candidate I don't want.
43 posted on 07/08/2012 12:36:39 AM PDT by Hillarys Gate Cult (Liberals make unrealistic demands on reality and reality doesn't oblige them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: txhurl; All

ABREIIMOWA non-voters.

AnybodyButRomneyEvenIfItMeansObamaWinsAgain
______________________________________________________________

Anybody But Romney Even If It Means Obama Wins Again ?????

Now that is bitterness to the max. My candidate did not win so I hope this nation goes down the tubes; huh? I bet that if the people with that attitude ever went through a bitter divorce, they’d rather see their kids put in a Foster Home ran by two flamings gays or lesbians, who are living together, and would molest their children, rather than see their spouse have them.

PITIFUL!!!


44 posted on 07/08/2012 5:42:44 AM PDT by pistolpackinpapa (Why is it that you never see any Obama bumper stickers on cars going to work in the mornings?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: TheBattman; All

well - if we had a “Conservative to vote for, it might be easier to get Conservatives motivated TO VOTE!!!!
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Sometimes you have to vote “against” someone or something rather than vote “for” someone or something. How about voting “against” the Kenyan, Marxist, Muslim in the White House who will see to it that your children and grandchildren never know the America you and I once knew? Your descendants deserve better. Think about someone besides yourself. The stakes are too high.


45 posted on 07/08/2012 5:48:42 AM PDT by pistolpackinpapa (Why is it that you never see any Obama bumper stickers on cars going to work in the mornings?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: pistolpackinpapa

Anybody But Romney Even If It Means Obama Wins Again ?????

Now that is bitterness to the max. My candidate did not win so I hope this nation goes down the tubes; huh? I bet that if the people with that attitude ever went through a bitter divorce, they’d rather see their kids put in a Foster Home ran by two flamings gays or lesbians, who are living together, and would molest their children, rather than see their spouse have them.

PITIFUL!!!

Now that is a keeper!


46 posted on 07/08/2012 5:54:59 AM PDT by csmusaret (I will give Obama credit for one thing- he is living proof that familiarity breeds contempt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: chimera; All

Whoever we put up against Obama better be prepared to take some heavy incoming dirt.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
While many people are not happy that we have a Mormon candidate, one thing for sure: It will be hard to dig-up any immorality or sex scandals on Mitt Romney. All they can say is “Bain Capital, Bain Capital, Bain Capital......” That won’t take them very far.

I wish Larry Sinclair would re-surface and, once again, bring up the fact that he performed oral sex on Obama in his Limo in Chicago while Obama smoked crack. I believe Larry Sinclair is telling the truth. But, even so, all you gotta do is put the thought in people’s heads.


47 posted on 07/08/2012 5:55:27 AM PDT by pistolpackinpapa (Why is it that you never see any Obama bumper stickers on cars going to work in the mornings?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: pistolpackinpapa
Sometimes you have to vote “against” someone or something rather than vote “for” someone or something. How about voting “against” the Kenyan, Marxist, Muslim in the White House who will see to it that your children and grandchildren never know the America you and I once knew? Your descendants deserve better. Think about someone besides yourself. The stakes are too high.

Indeed and I will be going to the polls to vote against the Obamanation.

48 posted on 07/08/2012 6:38:26 AM PDT by MEG33 (O Lord, Guide Our Nation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: pistolpackinpapa

I think you are wrong. By the time Obama gets through with his BS to blacks, they will turn out in record number.


49 posted on 07/08/2012 6:49:50 AM PDT by patriot08 (TEXAS GAL- born and bred and proud of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: csmusaret

they’d rather see their kids put in a Foster Home ran by two flamings gays or lesbians, who are living together, and would molest their children, rather than see their spouse have them.


That reminds me..does anyone have audio where Romney changed his stance on Gay marriage? I would assume he is pro-gay adoption,too.
I will likely vote for the puke, what choice do I have, but I won’t like it.
I will not fool myself into believing he is a conservative,too.
The best I could hope for is Romney shocks me, for the sake of his own legacy, and rule from the middle right.

Good luck America.


50 posted on 07/08/2012 6:51:00 AM PDT by Leep (Enemy of the StatistI)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Leep

I believe that Presidents come and go, but real power over the long term resides in Congress. I am pinning my hopes on TEA Party candidates winning Congressional seats across the country. The don’t get as much credit as they deserve, but the GOP freshmen have been holding Boehner’s feet to the fire. If we could have a repeat of 2010, Congress could make even Willard look Conservative. Romney was not my first choice or even my third choice, but right now he is my only choice. On his worst day he is vastly superior to Obama on his best day.


51 posted on 07/08/2012 7:02:39 AM PDT by csmusaret (I will give Obama credit for one thing- he is living proof that familiarity breeds contempt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: pistolpackinpapa; All

.

Anybody know where Larry’s site is now- if he has one?

Click on this:
http://larrysinclair-0926.blogspot.com/
and you get his site stating that he has moved.
You are instructed to click on his book about Obama and then you get this:
http://larrysinclair.org/
which appears to be about another Larry Sinclair. (???)

.


52 posted on 07/08/2012 7:07:13 AM PDT by patriot08 (TEXAS GAL- born and bred and proud of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: OrangeHoof

[ The unions and the Alinskyites pulled out all the stops to defeat Walker and it still didn’t work ]

They did manage to steal the Racine Senate seat though.


53 posted on 07/08/2012 7:07:32 AM PDT by KansasGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: pistolpackinpapa
All they can say is “Bain Capital, Bain Capital, Bain Capital......” That won’t take them very far.

In my state, the 'Rats have been running ads about it, and it seems to have had some effect. The reason it has is that the 'Rats have managed to re-cast the "Bain Capital" (which most people don't understand) meme into an everyday person context: closing of plants and businesses and relocation of jobs overseas. This has always been a vulnerability of the 'Pub positions and is a difficult one to refute when people see themslves and/or their neighbors suffering because of job losses to foreign labor markets. And if you talk to them about things like comparative advantage in labor costs or "creative destruction", their eyes glaze over because it has no meaning to their immediate circumstances (i.e., out of work).

We need to counter this by showing that a lot of the job losses are due not to the Bain Capital thing, but punitive taxation and overregulation, as well as stupid policy decisions (closing the Gulf to oil drilling, for example).

54 posted on 07/08/2012 8:10:39 AM PDT by chimera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: csmusaret

On his worst day he is vastly superior to Obama on his best day.


True. If the choice is eat a cup of ground up bugs or drink poison. A cup of bugs is the better choice by far.

Agree with winning as many Congressional seats as possible. As long as Obama, if he would somehow get reelected, doesn’t circumvent Congress anyhow.
Look how they got ObamaCare “passed”.
If they can do that what can’t they do?


55 posted on 07/08/2012 8:19:20 AM PDT by Leep (Enemy of the StatistI)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: All

And why are the republicans not screaming about this? They should be helping Rangel’s opponent.

But why expect them to do anything? What they should do is stand on the floor of the house and say the following:

“Calling someone a racist is the most vile thing you can call anybody. We now give the media and the democrat party fair warning. If any of you call any of us a racist, you will get the crap beat out of you. And the same thing goes for voter fraud. Don’t even think about it. We have passed a resolution paying Conservative county sheriffs to be at each polling place and your thugs will be arrested. By they time you try to stop us in Holder’s court, the election will have been over.”

Then they should follow up. They own the house. Slap one of the communists then refuse any type of discipline.


56 posted on 07/08/2012 8:28:01 AM PDT by Terry Mross ( To all my kin: Do not attempt to contact me as long as you love obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibLieSlayer

They (the enemy) have been processing the votes of dead people for decades. Even the illustrious leader bears the social security number of a dead person.

I suppose they consider it as some type of honor to the deceased.


57 posted on 07/08/2012 9:01:53 AM PDT by IbJensen (If you don't read the newspaper you are uninformed, if you do read the newspaper you are misinformed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen

There is a woman in Ohio that has filed suit over obama’s SSN and she registered to run for President... and now SHE has “standing”.

LLS


58 posted on 07/08/2012 9:20:01 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer (Don't Tread On Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: The Sons of Liberty

The other factor in the Walker recall is that the national Dems had advised the unions and State of Wisconsin Dems against going this route. That being the case, there was only so much money and exposure they were going to waste on a “governor” race when they are looking ahead to the “Presidential” race. They can be counted on to pull out all the stops when the top office and power of the House and Senate are at stake.


59 posted on 07/08/2012 9:51:54 AM PDT by onevoter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: All

Anybody know where Larry’s site is now- if he has one?

Click on this:
http://larrysinclair-0926.blogspot.com/
and you get his site stating that he has moved.
You are instructed to click on his book about Obama and then you get this:
http://larrysinclair.org/
which appears to be about another Larry Sinclair. (???)

.


60 posted on 07/09/2012 10:26:17 AM PDT by patriot08 (TEXAS GAL- born and bred and proud of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson