Guess I’ll have to kill someone who tries to take my weapons . Bring it on !!
“When They Take Them From My Cold,Dead Hands”!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
If that bill is passed you will see a huge increase in the crime rate in this country.
You can bet that the Swiss and the Yemeni, where every male over 16 carries an AK-47, will never give up their guns and that the UN will never ask them to do so.
This is clearly a case where the UN is singling out the US to change its Constitution and they know that, with Obama as POTUS, the time has arrived to do so.
“Most treaties submitted to the Senate have received its advice and consent to ratification. During its first 200 years, the Senate approved more than 1,500 treaties and rejected only 21. A number of these, including the Treaty of Versailles, were rejected twice. Most often, the Senate has simply not voted on treaties that its leadership deemed not to have sufficient support within the Senate for approval, and in general these treaties have eventually been withdrawn. At least 85 treaties were eventually withdrawn because the Senate never took final action on them. Treaties may also remain in the Senate Foreign Relations Committee for extended periods, since treaties are not required to be resubmitted at the beginning of each new Congress. There have been instances in which treaties have lain dormant within the committee for years, even decades, without action being taken.” - taken from US Senate website:
http://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/common/briefing/Treaties.htm
For whatever its worth, the Senate ratified Obama’s 70% reduction in deployed nuclear warheads (2011, New START Treaty).
O will do what he usually does. Sign a UN agreement and if the senate objects, go the back door route and enforce it through his departments(that already control most everything)with EOs. A few examples of this are immigration, energy and environmental “concerns”.
F U UN....(please go away!! You are (UN)American
First of all, even if such a treaty is approved (and I think that highly unlikely), it would be illegal - no treaty can override the Constitution, only a Constitutional Amendment can do that.
Further, with regard to the Bill of Rights, the simple fact is that the Constitution was only ratified because those at the Constitutional Convention promised that the 1st Congress would take up the issue of certain basic rights and pass amendments to specifically limit government power. If one of those first 10 Amendments is voided out, then it can safely be concluded that the entire Constitution is null and void.
In the event that the treaty is passed, and the (then-illegal) central government attempted to enforce its terms against the people of this country, I believe that many articles and threads like the 2 below will not only “go viral” all over the place, but that much of the advice or information presented in them will be implemented...none of which is calculated to make it easier to govern this country.
The Art of the Cache: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1735279/posts
What Good Can A Handgun Do Against An Army (Thread 4): http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/659714/posts
By the way, here’s the blog site for the author of the 2nd article: http://sipseystreetirregulars.blogspot.com/
Bump
BUCK OFAMA!