Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Future of the Roberts Court?
The Virginian ^ | 7/4/2012 | Moneyrunner

Posted on 07/04/2012 4:53:15 PM PDT by moneyrunner

John Roberts is currently in position similar to Benedict Arnold after West Point. Keep in mind that Arnold was a hero to the Revolution, instrumental in a number of hard-won victories and severely wounded in battle. But in his mind Arnold struggled between the cause of American independence and personal recognition. In the end, in one fateful decision he joined his former foes.

We are not in a shooting war and John Roberts need not fear the noose, but he does share a problem with Arnold. The Americans made Arnold’s name synonymous with treachery and the British didn’t trust him. I’m sure the Roberts decision on ObamaCare was seen by him as Solomonic. It wasn’t, and as his decision is analyzed and as sources in the Supreme Court expose the deliberations, Roberts will be seen as a man who put self before principle by his previous allies. The Left will take what he can give them but always view him with ambivalence.

The composition of the Court also makes it impossible for Roberts to recover his previous position as a moderate Constitutionalist. There are four Liberal votes on the Court who vote as a bloc on important issues that divide Conservatives and Liberals. Roberts can guarantee a Liberal majority in these cases, but can’t reliably deliver a Conservative one. By crossing enemy lines, he may have no choice but to join their side wholeheartedly if he wishes to leave any legacy except that of a failed traitor.

We may, unfortunately, have to live with that.


TOPICS: Government; History; Politics
KEYWORDS: obamacare; roberts; supremecourt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last
To: Chgogal

21 posted on 07/04/2012 7:09:47 PM PDT by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2
Forget the 4th of July, it was overruled.

I agree. At the picnic today anybody who wished me a Happy 4th, just got a hello back. I wasn't in the mood to celebrate the birthday of the dead Republic. Grilled meat and cold beer was my solace on the worst 4th of July in 236 years.

22 posted on 07/04/2012 7:18:32 PM PDT by skully (06/28/2012 : The banner no longer yet waves....Gadsden DTOM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: rockrr
What he did wasn’t treasonous - just stupid.

If gutting 235 years of “limiting principle” and giving the Fed more power to tax us into submission isn't treason; then the word has no real meaning. And yes he was stupid too.

Vivat Imperialis Washington

23 posted on 07/04/2012 7:29:05 PM PDT by skully (06/28/2012 : The banner no longer yet waves....Gadsden DTOM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: skully

>>> has to scratch with a cheese grater.

LOL, no worries. Roberts doesn’t have any (b@lls).


24 posted on 07/04/2012 7:51:00 PM PDT by Sir Napsalot (Pravda + Useful Idiots = CCCP; JournOList + Useful Idiots = DopeyChangey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Chgogal

Robers = Hitler. Tyranny rules. May God have mercy on his sole. I don’t.


25 posted on 07/04/2012 8:55:12 PM PDT by MtnClimber (To the left wrong is right, down is up and backward is "Forward")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

Why not his koi as well?


26 posted on 07/04/2012 8:58:17 PM PDT by going hot (Happiness is a momma deuce)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

I did not mean to imply I wish God has mercy on his soul. My post is intended to imply there is nothing God should so to accept this evil.


27 posted on 07/04/2012 8:59:41 PM PDT by MtnClimber (To the left wrong is right, down is up and backward is "Forward")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: going hot

And may there be mercury in his tuna, salmon, koi and sole!


28 posted on 07/04/2012 9:06:25 PM PDT by MtnClimber (To the left wrong is right, down is up and backward is "Forward")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: moneyrunner

If a principled conservative wins the presidency, we should not have to live with Roberts’ mistake. Three conservative justices lamented his rewrite of Obamacare. He was not authorized to change the law, only to declare it constitutional or un-. It was un-. A conservative congress could “reconcile” it right out of existence, and drum Roberts entirely out from under his black robe. Bye-bye. Hmm. A “principled politician” right or left. Possible?


29 posted on 07/04/2012 9:41:57 PM PDT by Grampa3711 (Some people bring happiness wherever they go; others, whenever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson