[Uncle Sham]

"The problem is less about conservative apathy than conservative nullificaition or overwhelm. That doesn’t read clearly."

Before change can be initiated, a certain degree of "non-acceptance" must be achieved. We are much closer to the "non-acceptance" stage as conservatives today than we were before this ruling. Would you agree with this?

[MHGinTN]

If you look carefully at what Roberts ruling does in terms of granting to the federal government the unlimited power now to use punative taxation, setting asdie a hundred or more years of restraint, I belive it will take a Constitutional amendment to nullify what that bastard did with the stroke of his stealthy leftist pen.

[Ken H]

Before change can be initiated, a certain degree of "non-acceptance" must be achieved. We are much closer to the "non-acceptance" stage as conservatives today than we were before this ruling. Would you agree with this?

I have no idea, and it sounds like mental masturbation in any case. This is what counts =>

"The Federal Government may enact a tax on an activity that it cannot authorize, forbid, or otherwise control."

J Roberts