1. Last time I checked, the vote is still scheduled for November 6. So it’s a nice hypothetical, but it’s not exactly “I endorse Mitt. I’m voting for Mitt. I’m asking my supporters to vote for Mitt. I’ll be doing anything and everything to help Mitt win.” See, that’s an endorsement. What the gov has said about her preferences for president in the primary and in the general, from the beginning until now, has consistently not been an final endorsement...of anybody, least of all Mitt Romney.
2. Sarah Palin has been consistently been unafraid of saying what she thinks and saying what she means, even on endorsements, even if her most likely supporters might not agree. Otherwise, she’d have supported Hayworth over McCain, she wouldn’t have supported Fiorina in California, she’d be endorsing Liljenquist right now over Orrin Hatch. Given that, why would she not endorse Mitt Romney, commit to doing all that stuff that endorsers do, right now? Or when Mitt locked up the nomination (and unless a freaking miracle occurs, he did)? Or really, at any time after she chose not to run? Why wouldn’t she? Hmm...don’t think too hard. What is, “She doesn’t want to, Alex”?
And really, as a non-candidate, she’s under no more obligation, either legal or moral, to support the guy than is your average Freeper. At some point it might become politic for her, looking out for her own future career, to come to terms with Mitt. But that’s an option, not an obligation. She really could, if she chose, say “Screw you gahs, I’m goin’ hooooome!” And honestly, after the last few years, I couldn’t entirely blame her.
Bishop RomneyCARE and his Legion of RINO Backstabbers
and DNC Backstabbers really don’t care what anyone
says. THE LIE about ENDORSEMENTS. They have
been lying for years .. with no shame. Perfect for the GOPe.