Which is the image presented to show Stanley Ann Dunham in a graduation image related to Mercer Island.
Posted on 06/11/2012 5:41:04 AM PDT by plenipotentiary
Both Barack Obama II and Stanley Ann Dunham are invented personas.
A male child was born, probably son of Malcolm X and an unknown woman possibly Jo Ann Newman (per Martha Trowbridge). The childs father knew his days were numbered so to protect his only son he arranged with his Muslim and Communist contacts, to have him brought up in Indonesia under the protection of President Sukarno. He was a member of the Presidents extended family and under the direct protection of a high ranking Indonesian special forces officer, Pak Lolo Soetoro (which was probably not his real name). Soetoro did have a wife, and Obama believed her to be his mother, but she was not.
Sukarno was removed from power in March 1967.
In 1971, Obama II was moved to Hawaii, at that point the character of Stanley Ann Dunham was created (the birth certificate they use is illegible and that indicates that it does not support the created identity, and therefor everything after that in her story is also false) to allow a connection with communist agents, the Dunham family, and allow Obama II to be mentored in Communism by Frank Marshall Davis. The Dunhams probably had a son called Stanley Armour Dunham Junior (fate unknown). They initially changed the first names to Shirley Ann, and then ridiculously to Stanley Ann Dunham. SAD was never in Seattle, Why would she go to University there and take a night school or correspondance course)
Obama I was introduce briefy as Obama II's fake father. There probably was a real son of Obama I, but he was sidelined (maybe the Roman Obama who was stranded in KGB training school in Moscow)and the person we now know as Barack Obama II took his identity.
Obama II is a creature of the KGB and the Muslim Brotherhood, who both share aims to impose their way of life on the USA.
There is no image of Stanley Ann Dunham in the U of WA yearbooks.
I think the original version of the image of her with sweater and pearls appeared here:
http://www.historylink.org/index.cfm?DisplayPage=output.cfm&file_id=8897
If you can locate the pic metadata please forward. Take a good look at the sources quoted at the bottom of the article.
The research is being done as a public service, and results are shared with those who can and are doing something about it.
The research is being done by whom? Citizen journalists?
It obviously isn't being done by a PI as you say as nobody is getting paid and I know of no PI's who do anything for free. They expect to get paid for any work they do.
Then there would be no “private” investigators. They don’t work for free.
The researchers are volunteers. Spending their own money, their own time, their own energy. That is the fact. If someone was paying them, they’d be able to do more. They are private people, investigating, that’s what I meant.
And even professional private investigators don’t reveal all their findings and sources publicly until the time is right.
We found this and "lo and behold" now that it's been seen by some in the public it simply isn't there any more.
Kind of like the recent Kenyan born bio discovered with the publisher.
That printed material still physically exists somewhere and taking it off the Web doesn't make it disappear, it only makes it less accessible. The same with the newspapers and yearbooks. They're out there somewhere, they simply have to be located.
It stands to reason that reserachers want to keep info where it is still easily visible, as money may not be available to do on the ground footwork, and printed material is also then removed. Look at the Mercer Island yearbooks - none can be found. Probably before people were asking difficult questions the yearbooks might have been able to be located.
Private investigators don’t generally alert the subjects of the investigation as to their findings and the tracks they’re following.
So if your "private investigators" are actually volunteers then I see no reason why they wouldn't come forward with anything they've found either.
Take the issue of Fast and Furious as an example. Mike Vanderboegh and David Codrea were "volunteer researchers" and they 'showed their hand' when they found out what was going on. Were they wrong in going public with what they had found out even though it wasn't "the whole kit and kaboodle"?
Obviously not. The same thing, IMO, applies here.
And the same thing applies with the publisher. I can still go and get a copy printed of my yearbook despite having graduated over 30 years ago.
Did the yearbook publisher destroy all of their originals? Or do they expect to get paid for a copy or get paid not print any copies?
When I said private investigators I mean private individuals who are investigating, I wasn’t trying to be deceitful, just being literal.
I assume that those investigating F and F have not made public every jot and tittle of the results of their research; just as those investigating this topic have not; but the researchers looking into the identity and background of Zero certainly have revealed a lot on FR. A tremendous amount, actually. And if you don’t see the logic of not laying their complete hand of cards face side up on the table when they’re still reseraching, I can’t explain it any more clearly.
Plus, this issue in a great deal deeper, years longer in the making, more people involved and much more complex than F and F. And much more more nefarious. Without this, F and F would never have happened.
You are badgering the witness. I am sure what the freeper meant by that comment was a simple analogy. Why are you trying to make a bunfight out of it?
I really thought you were somewhat more perceptive than you have shown yourself to be. It was the original commenter who said ‘these people are being concealed for a reason’ and I daresay you will receive a reply if the commenter feels so inclined. The fact that he hasn’t so far, indicates to me he meant what he said in his original comment. CONCEALED.
Just what is it you are asking for? A full report of the efforts of ten people over two years of research, laid out here so that the results can be trashed by the pondscum supporters of the dark side - and save you the time and trouble of doing a little more than your presence here shows?
It’s gimmie gimmie what you know, that’s all. Why should they? The results are being sent where they will do the most good. And when the SHTF then you’ll read about it here.
Sorry to be so blunt, but your attitude makes me angry.
If you choose to see that as a "bunfight" then go right ahead.
I've been waiting for the S to HTF for some time and I'm still waiting despite "the efforts of ten people over two years of research".
Perhaps if they had been more open with their research it wouldn't have taken so long and people of note (like Congress) would have undertaken a more serious stance by now.
A last second 'hail Mary' hardly seems a prudent course of action.
How would D Day have worked if the Allies had publicized their plans so the Germans knew exactly what they were about?
Which is the image presented to show Stanley Ann Dunham in a graduation image related to Mercer Island.
lj:
Look at the Mercer Island yearbooks - none can be found.
I would stipulate that none can be found from a source freely available to the public.
I simply can’t believe that every single yearbook was collected and/or destroyed. How many students went to that school? Every book purchased for that year by every 9th-12th grade student just magically disappeared? Even every yearbook for each of the years she went to Mercer suddenly disappears? I just don’t buy it. The key is “freely available to the public”.
And the same thing applies with the publisher. I can still go and get a copy printed of my yearbook despite having graduated over 30 years ago.
Did the yearbook publisher destroy all of their originals? Or do they expect to get paid for a copy or get paid not print any copies?
All I know is that researchers have not been able to locate any existing Mercer Island yearbooks, I didn’t say that none exist in the world. If you have some ideas, why not post your ideas or try to find one yourself? I do not remember all the different ways they tried, but they tried a number of ways to find one; IIRC the public library, school library and perhaps an ad in the paper were tried; I do not know for certain but assume some former students were asked. Maybe someone who knows more might say. I don’t know what you mean about paying/not paying. I don’t know how they would know the publisher without having a copy to look at.
But his true mother and her extended family in the US are at this point, a significant part of the effort that has made him a political figure. These people are being concealed for a reason.
Who is doing the concealing? Is it the Kenyan son hiding his past or is it David and some friends of his concealing what they know so that it's a surprise to all when it's announced?
...and I daresay you will receive a reply if the commenter feels so inclined.
It appears David hasn't been inclined and I doubt he will be in the future.
And why the wait to announce what is supposedly known? I can understand Arpaio waiting to maximize the potential press coverage, but "earth-shattering news" of the parentage of this pathological liar would bump everything else out of the spotlight.
It just doesn't make sense.
Oh, wait...that was a lie. Never mind.
GIMMIE GIMMIE. GIMMIE WHAT YOU HAVE.
I notice you didn’t ask if there was anything you could do to help. There are still openings. Perhaps you could find an Indonesian speaker, for example, there’s some stuff that needs to be translated.
If you want that rock moved off the road so you can pass, you don’t wait for someone else to move it, you do it yourself.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.