Skip to comments.
NBC's Savannah Guthrie Unintentionally Proves Obama Birth Certificate Tampered With (pencil marks)
BirtherReport.com ^
| May 23, 2012
| Mark Gillar
Posted on 05/23/2012 12:55:05 PM PDT by Seizethecarp
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 201-203 next last
To: zzeeman
I’m trying to help you not make conservatives look like idiots, so just calm down.
61
posted on
05/24/2012 12:19:13 AM PDT
by
Wayne07
To: Fred Nerks
So if you believe that zero is the son of the kenyan and the white teenager from Kansas, what are you doing here? You aught to be thrilled that the WON you voted for is where he is, and go back to sleep. You don't believe Obama is the son of the kenyan and the white teenager from Kansas? This sounds like a fun new birther twist. What's your angle? He is really the child of...?
62
posted on
05/24/2012 12:21:26 AM PDT
by
Wayne07
To: kjo
The national media is giving this issue the UFO treatment...keep laughing at the people who report this...and hope it will go away.
Why are we letting them alinsky us? We need to point out that rather than answer these logical questions, they mock the questioner. Don’t let them win! These are fair questions.
63
posted on
05/24/2012 12:21:49 AM PDT
by
Yaelle
To: TigersEye
The National Review explanation was just painfully and obviously stupid. The video demo was rather poor and lacked the obvious expertise that the demos linked in post #47 has. What was stupid about the National Review explanation? They are just presenting a fact: the PDF creation process creates layers and visual artifacts similar to the ones that birthers point to as evidence of forgery.
Why would National Review defend the validity of the certificate if they didn't believe it was real? They clearly don't like Obama and want to get rid of him.
64
posted on
05/24/2012 12:34:46 AM PDT
by
Wayne07
To: MrShoop
...because so many high ranking hawaiian officials are telling the same story.
yep, so many that you can count them all with your fingers. ;-)
65
posted on
05/24/2012 12:46:46 AM PDT
by
Brown Deer
(Pray for 0bama. Psalm 109:8)
To: MrShoop
Yeah, right the National RINOview, mouthpiece of the GOP-e, wants to get rid of 0bama. LOL
66
posted on
05/24/2012 12:48:18 AM PDT
by
TigersEye
(Life is about choices. Your choices. Make good ones.)
To: MrShoop
67
posted on
05/24/2012 12:50:54 AM PDT
by
TigersEye
(Life is about choices. Your choices. Make good ones.)
To: MrShoop; Fred Nerks
"I did my homework..."
You're a liar because your earlier response was: " Save me the time, and just go look in a mirror."
So are all these people lying? The governor, the director of health, the state registrar?
Yes! Are you really as dense as you act? Or are you just in love with your fag president?
68
posted on
05/24/2012 12:53:34 AM PDT
by
Brown Deer
(Pray for 0bama. Psalm 109:8)
To: TigersEye
If you believe the certificate is fake, do you think that the Governor of Hawaii and Director of Health and State Registrar are all in on it?
69
posted on
05/24/2012 12:53:49 AM PDT
by
Wayne07
To: MrShoop
![](http://images2-telegraaf.nl/multimedia/archive/00598/osama_598339i.jpg)
AND A
70
posted on
05/24/2012 12:53:59 AM PDT
by
Fred Nerks
(fair dinkum!)
To: Seizethecarp
Bookmarked for morning coffee.
71
posted on
05/24/2012 12:57:39 AM PDT
by
MHGinTN
(Being deceived can be cured.)
To: MrShoop
I find it very weak because he didn't go through the steps that many sites...
72
posted on
05/24/2012 1:00:54 AM PDT
by
Brown Deer
(Pray for 0bama. Psalm 109:8)
To: TigersEye
Yeah, right the National RINOview, mouthpiece of the GOP-e, wants to get rid of 0bama. LOL So you are making my point about birthers being delusional conspiracy theorists. National Review doesn't want to get rid of Obama? Suuure. All their writers are covering up for Obama - Mark Levin, Victor Davis Hanson, Frank Gaffney, Dennis Prager, Thomas Sowell. Mark Steyn. Those guys are all RINOs..
73
posted on
05/24/2012 1:01:06 AM PDT
by
Wayne07
To: Brown Deer
haha - maybe look up irony next.
74
posted on
05/24/2012 1:04:33 AM PDT
by
Wayne07
To: MrShoop
and you are doing a great job, 0BOT IDIOT!
75
posted on
05/24/2012 1:05:27 AM PDT
by
Brown Deer
(Pray for 0bama. Psalm 109:8)
To: Brown Deer; MrShoop
76
posted on
05/24/2012 1:48:25 AM PDT
by
Flotsam_Jetsome
(If not you, who? If not now, when?)
To: Uncle Chip
Apologies to you, sir. The image I posted referenced your nic, and I failed to include you on the “to” line of my comment.
77
posted on
05/24/2012 1:55:06 AM PDT
by
Flotsam_Jetsome
(If not you, who? If not now, when?)
To: jamese777
78
posted on
05/24/2012 3:31:27 AM PDT
by
Brown Deer
(Pray for 0bama. Psalm 109:8)
To: rolling_stone
... and just who, specifically, is on the hook legally for this? Who has been held to account?
To: TigersEye
I use Adobe Creative Suite every day. A PDF is a document format, a file type. It can have layers. It can have vectors. It can be a flattened uneditable document. It can be RGB, it can be CMYK, it can be grayscale, etcetera etcetera. Attempting to ascertain or condemn the accuracy of any content of a PDF by means of the manner in which the file was saved is meaningless. A PDF, again, is merely a document file type, one of many. It is not automatically a scan of anything and it is not “fake” or a “forgery” if it isn’t. It’s not automatically authentic or valid if is a scan. This whole thing is a fool’s errand. It is what it is, independent of the factuality of any representation it may appear to make.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 201-203 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson