Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: 38special
You mean like on AZ SB 1070? Or the 2007 AZ law on mandatory E-verify that was upheld by SCOTUS last year?

AZ passed a law out of the legislature requiring more stringent requirements for Presidential eligibility to be on the ballot. Jan Brewer vetoed it. Another bill is now brewing in the legislature based on Arpaio's Cold Case Posse findings. Secretary of State Bennet is aware of both.

Some official in Hawaii must now put his or her name on the line certifying that such a document exists. Failure to do so will result in Obama not being on the ballot in AZ. Just as importantly, the official who certifies that the document exists puts himself on the line for possible criminal prosecution should it be found to be untrue. Arpaio may be readying such a case once an official has been identified. Arpaio has indicated that there is a person of interest in terms of a forgery charge.

AZ has been the point man on more than one issue in this country. They are not caving. I wish more states emulated AZ. Maybe the 10th Amendment would be more respected.

10 posted on 05/20/2012 8:45:30 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: kabar

That was also my thought. As long as it is only the nebulous ‘State of Hawaii’ as a whole that is being represented, then it’s no real legal shakes. When it is one specific person putting their name on the line as certifying something as true it had better be or big, big trouble ahead.


22 posted on 05/20/2012 9:27:54 AM PDT by JPG (Don't just talk about it, make it happen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson