Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic List:
Please ping me to note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of general interest.
Posted on 05/13/2012 2:31:30 PM PDT by wagglebee
When a Canadian man named Hassan Rasouli suffered complications after brain surgery, his doctors wanted to pull the plug. But his Muslim family said no. It was against Hassan’s values, and moreover, they believed he showed signs of improvement. In any event, they wanted him to be able to continue to fight for life.
But that didn’t end matters. The doctors claimed that continuing treatment was “futile” because he would never get better. Moreover, they announced they intended to stop all treatment except for comfort care — regardless of the family’s desires or their patient’s personal values — an example of what is known in bioethics as “Futile Care Theory” or “medical futility.”
The case ended up in court. Justifying their desired imposition on the family, the doctors testified in a written affidavit: “It is as certain as anything ever is in medicine that he will never recover any degree of consciousness,” Wrong. Hassan later woke up and became reactive to the point that he can now give a “thumbs up” when asked how he is doing.
Despite this, the doctors are still conducting tests to determine whether they remain committed to stopping his treatment. Further, they have asked the Canadian Supreme Court to grant physicians the general legal right to refuse wanted life-extending treatment. If they prevail, it will mean that extending life will cease to be considered medically “beneficial” — even when that is what the patient and/or family wants.
Some might snort derisively and think, “Well, that’s Canada with single-payer health care. That’s what happens in socialized systems.”
Not so fast. Futile Care Theory has been pushed quietly by bioethicists in this country for years. Indeed, many, if not most, hospitals have promulgated some form of internal futile care protocol. Not only that, but many states — most notably Texas — legally grant hospitals the statutory right to refuse wanted life-sustaining treatment.
This is how the Texas law, seen as a model by many futilitiarians, works: Under the Texas Health and Safety Code, if the physician disagrees with a patient’s decision to receive treatment, he or she can take it to the hospital bioethics committee. A hearing is convened at which all interested parties explain why they want or don’t want treatment to continue.
If the committee decides to refuse treatment, it is determinative. Even if the family finds another doctor willing to provide the treatment, it can’t be done in that hospital. At that point, the patient/family has a mere ten days to find another hospital willing to take the patient, after which, according to the statute, “the physician and health care facility are not obligated to provide life-sustaining treatment.”
In practical terms, that’s a death sentence. The economics of medicine have changed from the old fee-for-service days. Today, extended care in ICUs is usually a money loser for hospitals, meaning that families find it almost impossible to find a facility willing to accept the transfer of expensive patients whose care has been declared to be “futile.” There are even reported cases of desperate families looking out of state for a facility willing to provide treatment for a loved one about to be pushed out of the lifeboat by a Texas hospital.
If the committee decides to refuse treatment, it is determinative. Even if the family finds another doctor willing to provide the treatment, it can’t be done in that hospital. At that point, the patient/family has a mere ten days to find another hospital willing to take the patient, after which, according to the statute, “the physician and health care facility are not obligated to provide life-sustaining treatment.”
In practical terms, that’s a death sentence. The economics of medicine have changed from the old fee-for-service days. Today, extended care in ICUs is usually a money loser for hospitals, meaning that families find it almost impossible to find a facility willing to accept the transfer of expensive patients whose care has been declared to be “futile.” There are even reported cases of desperate families looking out of state for a facility willing to provide treatment for a loved one about to be pushed out of the lifeboat by a Texas hospital.
Please understand, I am not saying that it would never be right to withdraw wanted treatment. Any one of us can conjure a scenario in which imposing increasingly painful and extreme interventions could cross the line into abuse. But these disputes should not be adjudicated behind closed doors in star chamber-like proceedings run by bioethicists who do not share the values of patients and their families, and who work in institutions with a financial stake in the outcomes. Rather, they belong in a court of law, with the right to press access, cross examination, a public record and appeal.
Moreover, if doctors want a patient to die sooner rather than later, they should bear the strong burden of proof in order to prevail. After all, the point of Futile Care Theory is to impose a form of the death penalty. When in doubt, every benefit of doubt belongs to wanted life.
Wesley J. Smith is a senior fellow at the Discovery Institute’s Center on Human Exceptionalism and consults for the Patients Rights Council and the Center for Bioethics and Culture.
And it is pure evil.
Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list.
FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
When your money runs out you are a dead duck.
Be sure to check out the death panels in Obamacare.
BUMP
BUMP
Duty to Die is evil, yes
Socialists/Totalitarians are all about plunder and death. It’s how they roll...over all of us, especially the weak, old, infirm, disabled, etc., etc.
DEPOPULATE socialists from the body politic. Amazingly “we the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union...” can still VOTE THEM OUT.
This thinker had them figured out over 160 years ago...
“Above all, if you wish to be strong, begin by rooting out every particle of socialism that may have crept into your legislation. This will be no light task.” - Frederic Bastiat 1801-1850
Here is some proof of some of the damage they have done...
C’mon November!
Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic List:
Please ping me to note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of general interest.
If anyone is thinking of putting their aged parents in a nursing home these days, don’t do it. If you want them healthy, keep them home with you.
“Once Obamacare is up and running, centralized boards will create cost-benefit bureaucratic boards....”
.
Did anyone notice that none of the congresscritters who passed this evil bill will be subjected to Bambicare?
That, by itself, should outrage the American voter.
The Democrats are PRO DEATH OF INNOCENTS REGARDLESS OF AGE, beginning with conception. They are PRO LIFE for MURDERS. Come to think of it, taking an innocent life is MURDER and all involved, including those politicians etc who aid and abet these deaths should ALL BE TRIED, for yup, MURDER. NAZIs were eventually brought to trial, I hope these people are eventually brought to trial and justice.
My orthopeodic surgeon informed my that there is a clause in Obamacare that prohibits surgery (we were discussing knees) if the patient’s BMI (body mass index) is too high. IOW if the patient is too fat. This is part of the fine print that NOBODY in Congress read.
These “Doctors” better realize that sooner or later they`ll kill off the wrong person, someone with a family member who`ll return the favor.
Read what I wrote below.
If that BMI deal is true, there will be a lot of Baraqqi supporters shut out of getting ops.
So called Medical Ethicists have deemed it acceptable to consider killing a new born baby an abortion and Bioethicists think Futile Care doctrine is acceptable. These clowns need to review the definition of ethics. This reeks of another policy from Ezekiel Emanuel.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.