[WOSG]

Whats more preferable? Lets see:

Romney: for Ryan budget, against SSM, supports 2nd and NRA, lower tax rates, supports ‘self-deportation’, supports Roe v Wade overturn, will pass conservative Congress bills, vetoed hundreds of liberal bills as governor.

Obama: Socialist, for SSM,gun-grabbing “fast and furious”,big-gov, wants higher tax rates, spent $6 trillion in new debt,open borders,abortionist [D] who will stop conservative bills with his vetos.

[kevcol]

Whats more preferable? Lets see:

Romney: for Ryan budget, against SSM, supports 2nd and NRA, lower tax rates, supports ‘self-deportation’, supports Roe v Wade overturn, will pass conservative Congress bills, vetoed hundreds of liberal bills as governor.

Obama: Socialist, for SSM,gun-grabbing “fast and furious”,big-gov, wants higher tax rates, spent $6 trillion in new debt,open borders,abortionist [D] who will stop conservative bills with his vetos.

While I think you are white-washing Willard at best, my point is that his election to POTUS permanently marginalizes Conservatives IMO, and sends the message to the GOP-e "no need to lie to Conservatives anymore, full speed ahead with evolvement". Its not so much a blind hatred for Willard as it is a hatred for those insideous traitors from within the GOP-e enabling and pushing this agenda. I'd rather see massive gridlock than the entire country lurching left. If Willard is elected (without my vote) I hope there are enough true Conservatives in Congress to offset the multitude of [D] crossover votes Willard will get to push his legislation. You know damn well that the GOP-e will point to Willards election (if that's the case) as a mandate for the whole party to "get on board" with agenda, and many [R] congress critters will eagerly jump.