[RJS1950]

I don’t know where to start with how flawed that logic is. Every vote that does not go to Romney puts the real evil another vote in the lead. The only “good” vote that is put ahead is in your mind.

It IS ABO, your guys and mine did not get the nomination, get that into your hard heads!

[raccoonradio]

Indeed, ABO. By the way Romney is almost there delegate-wise. Who voted for him? Republicans. Yes, in some states independents/ unenrolleds or even Democrats are allowed to vote in the Republican primary. People looked at all the candidates and ultimately, even if by a small margin, they chose him. A recent poll said 91 per cent of Republicans choose Romney. Or at least 91 per cent will not vote for Obama. Maybe they will vote third party or something.

4 more years of The One will kill this country. If you want a more conservative candidate next time, support them; otherwise perhaps the GOP is no longer conservative. Regardless, it comes down to Romney vs. Obama. Either someone who is at least half decent, or more Hope and Change.

[so_real]

It IS ABO, your guys and mine did not get the nomination, get that into your hard heads!

Hillary Clinton is "ABO". Would you vote for her if she had an "R" behind her name? Issue for issue her positions are identical to Romney's. In fact, there's not a dime's worth of difference between Romney, Clinton, and Obama -- though Clinton is the only one with an unquestioned natural born citizen status. This "hard head" sees past the "R" and the "D" to what lies beneath. Romney, Clinton, and Obama are all just pawns used for the advancement of socialism and the reduction of our republic. You don't save the republic by advancing your opponent's pawns.

[Colonel_Flagg]

I don’t know where to start with how flawed that logic is.

Well, you could start with the fact that 0+1 does not equal -1 as you seem to believe.

As I posted upthread, if you Romney Republicans want your guy to win, you need my vote a heck of a lot more than I need yours.

So, in the interests of that argument, please explain how a vote for a known progressive, giving him control of the party apparatus of the supposedly right-of-center party in this country, advances the cause of conservatism. After all, this is the purpose of this website.

I have had it up to my back teeth with the flawed argument that voting for an actual conservative for President is somehow a vote for Baraq. It's wrong by every possible definition. It's a vote FOR good.