[DiogenesLamp]

LOL, that's ironic! I don't know what you mean when you talk of "votes," but I certainly have presented a fact, and it's one with which you do not disagree.

The "fact" that you bring is that a bunch of people (judges) have all voted the same way. Again, this is not proof that they are correct, all the mores so because their reasoning is all over the place.

You keep presenting a consensus as proof of something, and we keep telling you that the actual laws and historical facts disagree with their conclusions.

[BigGuy22]

“The “fact” that you bring is that a bunch of people (judges) have all voted the same way. Again, this is not proof that they are correct”
__

And I agree. I’ve never said anything different, despite all your posturing on the subject.

Maybe someone else would like to have that fight with you. But you’re not going to get anywhere pretending I’ve said things and then arguing with them.