“And you’re STILL using a concensus argument.”
__
I am certainly speaking of the consensus that exists, based on the fact that all of the judges who have ruled on the matter have come to the same conclusion. Not one has lent any support to the argument that the lack of two citizen parents precludes natural born citizenship. Not one. Nada. Zilch. There is a complete consensus on the conclusion, even if you want to quibble over the details of how they got there.
What I have not said is that I regard the consensus as evidence of correctness and, despite your insistence, you have still been unable to provide a quote in which I did so.
There is no need to quote you. Virtually every response has been the same. "This group of people disagree, therefore you are wrong." Since this is clearly your mantra, it is pointless to remind you of what you have just written.
Truth is immuned to consensus.