Then why do you keep repeating numbers?
I said that the existence of the consensus indicates that an understanding of the current state of the law is widely shared among judges.
Or a misunderstanding is widely shared among judges. Given the evidence available, this is the more likely scenario.
How anyone could regard an amendment grating citizenship to slaves means we must accept foreign citizens as President is just a stretch too far for a sensible man.
I have taken no stand on its correctness.
Sure you have. By equating falsity and truth as a matter of opinion you have taken a stand for falsity.
Would you be so confused as to the correctness or incorrectness of slavery?