Posted on 04/27/2012 1:49:34 PM PDT by Mark Mayberry
______________________________________
And, God knows, strangers with guns who follow you in the night would never do anything illegal.....
What color is the sun on your planet?
All that matters is who started this fight...and, in spite of the legions of freepers who claim otherwise, only two people know the answer...the guy who died and the guy who killed him.
Seems like freepers are going by what evidence they have seen so far versus flapping lips of race baitors who are looking for a good lynching.
If you have special evidence showing Zimmerman started the fight and is a liar, let us bad freepers in on it. The judge and jury has to look at the evidence and can’t go on how they feel it might have gone down based on the charged statements and manipulations of the press and race baitors.
When the prosecution submits her evidence against Zimmerman, then we can debate the validity that. But currently, I have seen nothing.
All that matters is who started this fight...and, in spite of the legions of freepers who claim otherwise, only two people know the answer...the guy who died and the guy who killed him.
Seems like freepers are going by what evidence they have seen so far versus flapping lips of race baitors who are looking for a good lynching.
If you have special evidence showing Zimmerman started the fight and is a liar, let us bad freepers in on it. The judge and jury has to look at the evidence and can’t go on how they feel it might have gone down based on the charged statements and manipulations of the press and race baitors.
When the prosecution submits her evidence against Zimmerman, then we can debate the validity that. But currently, I have seen nothing.
When you or any of the other freepers who have written on this and other threads that there are corroborating neutral eye-witness statement(s) that support his claim, can find them, then post them. Heck, if so many of you have seen them it should be easy.
For my money the most damning thing against Trayvon was the ABC interview of his friend DeeDee. As I recall, she said that Trayvon said something to the effect: “Why are you following me?” To which George said: “Why are you here?” Then she heard no more conversation and the phone went dead.
It doesn't pass the smell test for me to think that George would have slugged Trayvon. It seems much more plausible that Trayvon would have responded to George's question by punching him.
Also, remember that the original investigators did not find discrepancies between what George said happened and the physical evidence and the earwitnesses. George didn't know what the evidence would find or the witnesses would have heard when he talked to the police, so he would have been on shaky ground if he had started to make things up that could have been disproven.
Also remember that there doesn't seem to be any evidence of George confronting suspicious people before and he did call the cops. If he was planning on doing something illegal, it seems odd that he would have called the cops.
____________________________________
You're right --- I missed the link to the witness who stated that he saw martin jump zimmerman --- and I just can't find it --- Do you know where it is? I bet you don't.
There is one witness that has made a statement to the effect, TM struck GZ from behind knocking him to the ground and etc.. The police and the prosecution have that statement. That witness will not be required to take the stand.
Bingo, if you said George Zimmerman!
LOL, you are a piece of work. :)
You should have followed the case and then you would know what was written about what witnesses to the police they saw. :)
You can go back through all the earlier threads that you missed and find the reports. Better than making stuff up about Zimmerman’s guilt.
A witness saw trayvon on top of Zimmerman.
>>A witness saw trayvon on top of Zimmerman.<<
Unfortunately, that only proves that Zimmerman was losing the fight. It doesn’t prove who started it.
For the record, I believe Zimmerman’s story, and have contributed to his defense fund.
I followed the case from day one -— that is how I know that you can not produce any witness statements that say that martin jumped zimmerman, not a single one...there aren’t any...and you know it.
If you have a link to a neutral corroborating itness then please provide it.
If you have a link to a neutral corroborating witness then please provide it.
Then why didn't George Zimmerman just shoot Sweet Widdle Twayvon when he first spotted him, rather than going through the trouble of calling 911?
Why don't you just admit that you know with every fiber of your being that George Zimmerman is an evilracistsexisthomophobe who goes around shooting People of Color for fun?
Next?
I’ll give you a clue, one more time. You, the race baitors and the prosecution, are the accusers. In our justice system it is up to you to prove him guilty. Where is your evidence that the mess did not go down as Zimmerman told the cops?
That is the last time I will ask and if you have no evidence, you should give it up until you do. If you keep pounding the table with no evidence, you are a kook who disrespects the justice system and I won’t pay attention to you anymore. :)
A lot of freepers swear that there is a witness statement that says TM attacked GZ.
Funny thing though, nobody, including you, can produce it. Why is that?
I agree. What's more, I think Trayvon’s friend DeeDee inadvertently supported Zimmerman's side of the story in her ABC interview. She said that Trayvon asked Zimmerman why Zimmerman was following him, and Zimmerman responded by asking why Trayvon was there. Then she heard no more conversation and the phone went dead. It makes more sense to me that Trayvon would have answered Zimmerman's question with a punch than that Zimmerman would have asked a question and then punched Trayvon without waiting for an answer.
Unfortunately, that only proves that Zimmerman was losing the fight. It doesn’t prove who started it.>>:A witness saw trayvon on top of Zimmerman.<<
Starting a fight with a stranger is a brash act; how do you know that the guy you are picking on isn’t a karate master, or heavily armed? Assuming that the older man was heavier than the 17yo, it would seem more likely that Martin would have gained his advantage by surprise than by force. And given that Zimmerman knew the police would arrive in the immediate future, that seems like an unlikely time to be committing a felony, especially not knowing that none of the neighbors would see. Martin was wearing a hoodie and was not well known in the neighborhood; he presumably believed in his own anonymity. Zimmerman knew that if he engaged in a fight, no matter what the outcome of it he would not be anonymous.For the record, I believe Zimmerman’s story, and have contributed to his defense fund.On the other side of the ledger, we have the fact that Zimmerman is not backed up by the Associated Press journalism monopoly and his opponents are. And the fact that my suppositions are not absolute proof - and that is what you need when journalism strips you of your presumption of innocence.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.