Replies

Why do antibiotics prove less effective after their initial introduction?
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

I can NOT fight a strawman of your creation. How many times in my posts did I use the word MACRO evolution ( known by some as “Darwinism”) ?

Fact: Macro evolution is of NO importance to the overwhelming majority of scientists. Most never even spend a nano-second on the subject in their graduate programs or in their daily work. And....This is true even for biologists.

Fact: Those who invented the techniques used for studying and measuring radioactive decay, plate tectonics, or the speed of light didn't give a twit about Macro evolution and likely attended all their various levels of schooling BEFORE macro evolution was part of the curriculum.

Solution: Remove the “Veto Power” of the voting mob. Privatize universal K-12 education. End the curriculum wars.

It is impossible to have a politically, religiously, and culturally neutral education.

There is no scientific difference. Evolution is evolution. Without understanding the theory of evolution one wouldn't understand human differences and its impact on how medicine will work on different populations or antibiotic resistance and how it develops.

But once again you FAIL to address my argument.

If we give those with a primitive and superstitious view of reality a veto power over what is taught in science class it will not end with evolution.

It seems that the majority of the “major scientific discoveries” listed creationists have MACRO objections to - they don't have MICRO objections to those fields of science - they have MACRO objections.

That is why your strawman that it is ONLY one facet of one theory and therefore NOT that important is inapplicable to reality - because it is NOT just that one facet of one theory that creationists object to - it is major features of almost every scientific discipline.

Rant about public schools all you want - I support privatization of schools, vouchers, homeschooling, you name it. But so long as there are public schools - science should be taught in science class.

Not just what science is acceptable to those with a primitive and superstitious view of the world.

How many times in my posts did I use the word MACRO evolution ( known by some as “Darwinism”) ?

If (as the evolutionists say) evolution is compatible with God, and if micro-evolution equals evolution (as the evolutionists like to say), then the following is merely a statement of evolution: man evolved from Adam and Eve, who were created by God. Since this is evolution, it can be taught in evolution class. And evolutionists should have no objection to it.