They “defended” the teaching of science in science class.
The judge did delve into the supposed scientific merits of the Incompetent Design philosophy - and like most other people found it was built from the ground up with the intention of being a Trojan Horse for creationism and has on its own no scientific merit.
It is as useless as Creationism.
In the battle of scientific discussion creationists are woefully outgunned. The discussion in science is about what is useful - what models help explain and predict data and lead to useful applications. Creationism is useless in this regard.
No, it was not about science.
"The judge did delve into the supposed scientific merits of the Incompetent Design philosophy."
No, he did not.
"The discussion in science is about what is useful."
No, it is not with you or any Evo.