Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I don’t know that much about how the law will handle this. But if this analysis is sound on what needs to be in the affadavit, then it certainly is deficient.

As I understand it, she also made a mistake about the exact wording of what Zimmerman said on the tape, according to something I read here a day or two ago.

Seems to me that this gives quite a bit for a good defense attorney to work with.


3 posted on 04/14/2012 7:38:53 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Cicero
It appears to be OK for the prosecutor to play fast and loose with the known facts. So what if millions of white (or other non-black) Americans have their faith in the judicial system further damaged, as long as Al Sharpton, Bobby Rush, Jesse Jackson, etc., are happy.

All Zimmerman has to do is to prove he doesn't have a depraved mind and wasn't thinking any politically-incorrect thoughts on that evening. He is in the position of having to prove his innocence.

Having a trial may gain him some additional months of life--if he is acquitted someone will kill him to collect the bounty, and if he is convicted he'll be killed by another prisoner.

15 posted on 04/14/2012 9:28:43 PM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson