I don’t know that much about how the law will handle this. But if this analysis is sound on what needs to be in the affadavit, then it certainly is deficient.
As I understand it, she also made a mistake about the exact wording of what Zimmerman said on the tape, according to something I read here a day or two ago.
Seems to me that this gives quite a bit for a good defense attorney to work with.
All Zimmerman has to do is to prove he doesn't have a depraved mind and wasn't thinking any politically-incorrect thoughts on that evening. He is in the position of having to prove his innocence.
Having a trial may gain him some additional months of life--if he is acquitted someone will kill him to collect the bounty, and if he is convicted he'll be killed by another prisoner.