Black people should be immune to suspicion for the sakde of nondiscrimination.
We have come full circle on racial discrimination.
only one problem, many , many of the recipients/ entitled class have made career choices.... and we see the results in their pro-proportionate representation in crime stats.
The figures do not lie. Remember, figures do not lie, liars figure.
Just some “Critical Race Theory” in action. CRT demands that blacks be given preference in criminal law just like they are given in constitutional law.
In fact Derrick Bell, Obamas legal mentor at Harvard, was protesting the denial of tenure at Harvard to Regina Austin in the 1991 demonstration led by Obama. Austin, would write in 1992 about the “positive significance of black lawbreaking.”
http://www.nydailynews.com/opinion/truth-breitbart-vetting-barack-obama-article-1.1035478
Central to Austin’s “Advanced Torts” course is her claim that minority status confers the privilege of interpreting the law as one pleases.
As writer Heather MacDonald points out, Professor Austin, in her published articles, has exhorted the black community to reject the distinction between lawful and unlawful activity as the imposed strictures of an oppressive white society.
Austin pours scorn on such “traditional values” as “conformity to the law,” which she insists will “intensify] divisions within the black community.” Austin has also called on blacks to engage in outright lawbreaking, which she calls “hustling,” but which in fact amounts to any number of acts of thievery licensed by Austin’s demands for social justice. Thus, “clerks in stores [who] cut their friends a break on merchandise, and pilfering employees [who] spread their contraband around the neighborhood,” are encouraged by Austin to occupy the “good middle ground between straightness and more extreme forms of lawbreaking.”
http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/individualProfile.asp?indid=2168