[thackney]

the caucus vote meant absolutely nothing bccause the delegates sent to the convention were not in proportion to the caucus vote.

The delegates are selected far prior to the actual vote. It is unlikely it has ever matched the vote in any state in any year.

But where is there any claim that the delegates will not follow the vote? All I see is a guess masqueraded as fact. Every delegate interviewed said they would follow the vote.

[cotton1706]

That is just another part of the game. It arificially increases the amount of delegates that Romney “has” and so the media, the Romney campaign can say that Romney’s the eventual nominee. Then the people in the remaining states say to themselves, “well, my candidate’s not going anywhere, I might as well vote for Romney. Then Romney wins those states and so the delegates.

Even should the delegates in ND vote along caucus lines, it will not matter at that point.