Well, I think you are a fool also!
Just because you use the language like that identifies you as an uneducated, foolish communicator.
The primary was a competition that will have one winner. Duh! So the conservative vote was split five ways, four ways, then three, then two. What does it matter?
The problem wasn't the conservatives lack of unity, it was their lack of superior leadership.
I started with Cain and the 9-9-9 plan. I sent lots of money, then Woops!
Then I switched to Gingrich and I watched him set himself on fire after Florida.
I never liked Santorum, Paul is unelectable.
I still like Newt but he ruined his chances, torpedoed his own campaign for reasons unknown to me. Why didn't he stick with his original plan, the one where he refused to attack other Republicans?
So the “nice hair and looks presidential” guy was left standing. Why? because more people voted for him! They didn't vote for the other guys. I'm not going to lie about why it happened. Romney turned out to be the "turtle" that Newt declared himself to be.
” Why didn’t he stick with his original plan, the one where he refused to attack other Republicans”
It is irrelevant at this point, but I would really like to know just what Gingrich did or said that was considered “attacking other republicans”. I have supported newt from the beginning and listened to most of his speeches and comments. For the life of me, I have not heard a single thing that should be considered an attack. The only possibility would be his comments and questions about Bain and Romney and frankly, I think those were valid points, and far less viscous than what was being leveled against him.