That’s possible, but she pretty much lost any credibility with her initial interviews. But I think she’s a left wing lesbian with a grudge against Zimmerman- or men in general. If it is Cutcher, it’s actually pretty bizarre CNN is now hiding her identity because of her new more robust story. I mean, she did an open interview with Anderson Cooper right before he went and had his nails done.
It was a joke. Well, sort of. She'd fit right in, because she's so good at fabricating details and jumping to conclusions.
-- I think she's a left wing lesbian with a grudge against Zimmerman- or men in general. --
Maybe just a softie. Heart goes out based on news reports (notice, her statements AFTER the news differ from those before; and at least one of her observation correlates what she saw with one of the OTHER 911 calls. She could not have heard that until after March 16th.
Not saying she isn't a flaming lib, or that she isn't a bi/homo, or that she isn't biased against men.
-- If it is Cutcher, it's actually pretty bizarre CNN is now hiding her identity because of her new more robust story. --
Hiding the witnesses identity does a few things, none of them "honest." It lets Cutcher change her story, and because CNN has conditioned the listener to think it's a new witness, one that hasn't made public remarks, the witness isn't impeaching her own testimony. It carries the possibility of increased ratings, for people hungry for new news from a new source.
At bottom, it's just more of "trial by media," against Zimmerman.