Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Cincinatus' Wife

I’m afraid there’s a lot of wishful thinking here. While all of these States have quirks in their delegate allocation details - Fl and AZ were always “winner take all” States, while ID was proportional - but with a “winner take all” provision if certain percentages were reached.

Romney isn’t my first choice, but the math to get to 1144 is strikingly simple. The key is that there are only 7 remaining States that are “winner take all,” and Romney is likely to win all of them.

Given that, unless Santorum can win one of the major Winner take all States, Romney only needs to get 26.2% of the remaining proportionally distributed delegates to get to 1144 prior to Tampa. The state by state math here: http://axdwhiteman.info/index.php/quick-hits


5 posted on 04/02/2012 2:15:32 PM PDT by crescen7 (game on)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: crescen7
I’m afraid there’s a lot of wishful thinking here.

The way I read this is Newt is moving the goalposts. He said he would drop out if Romney got to 1144; he now sees that Romney will almost certainly get to 1144; so he's now saying he will drop out only if Romney gets to an "undisputed" 1144.

7 posted on 04/02/2012 2:24:39 PM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: crescen7

The rules from the rnc state that the states are winner take all PROVIDED the primary is held no earlier than april(IIRC).Well it wasnt so the delegates are proportional.Thats why NEWT is going to hold his feet(rombots) to the fire demanding those are hard delegates.


10 posted on 04/02/2012 3:54:34 PM PDT by HANG THE EXPENSE (Life's tough.It's tougher when you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: crescen7
The facts are that the RNC wants the primaries/caucuses calendar set, so they penalized states half of their delegates if they moved their state's date up in the queue.

Regarding "winner take all" in these same states moving their primaries before March 6th:

____________________________

Jan 30, 2012 "So the winner on Tuesday gets all of Florida’s 50 delegates to the GOP convention, right? It says so right in the Republican Party of Florida primary rules.

Eh . . . probably. You see, the Republican National Committee wanted the primary season to start later (that didn’t work out so well) and they wanted the early states to award their delegates proportionally. But those rules came about under Chairman Michael Steele; by the time Florida set its date, Reince Priebus was running the show, and the RNC approved the current winner-takes-all system. The Florida GOP says it’s a non-issue; the current RNC leadership has signed off on the winner-take-all system.

The Tampa Bay Times’s Adam Smith reports, “All it takes is a registered Florida Republican to file a protest with the RNC, and the party’s contest committee would have to consider the issue when it meets in August just before the convention.”

The party’s primary rules were intended to encourage a longer primary season, while ensuring that four smaller states — Iowa, New Hampshire, Nevada, and South Carolina — hold the first contests. Only those states were permitted to hold primaries or caucuses before March 6, the RNC decreed, while any state that held a contest prior to April 1 would award its delegates proportionally. Under the rules, any party that violated the sanctioned calendar would lose half its delegates and potentially face further penalties.

Republican leaders in Florida, determined to give the state a big say in picking the nominee, decided having their delegation slashed from 99 to 50 was worth it and set Florida’s primary for Jan. 31. The RNC has said Florida will be a winner-take-all primary, but that decision is still subject to challenge.

If tomorrow’s results are in line with recent polls, Mitt Romney will win 50 delegates and everyone else will win none. (Thus, Rick Santorum and Ron Paul spent a limited amount of time and resources in Florida.) But if it were proportional, Romney would win about 20-25, Gingrich would win about 14-16, Santorum would win about 5-7, and Paul would win 5-6.

In other words, Newt Gingrich may have enormous incentive to file protests and perhaps even legal challenges to the RNC to make Florida allocate its delegates proportionally."

____________________________

State by state math HERE

16 posted on 04/03/2012 12:44:36 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson