Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Seizethecarp
"if presented to the appropriate forum as part of a proper evidentiary presentation, "

Any ideas what is the "appropriate forum" the judge is talking about?

4 posted on 03/29/2012 9:05:19 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Red Steel
Arpaio is angling for a criminal indictment and trial of the person or persons who forged the LFBC and SSS registration. That is the sort of “appropriate forum” I believe the judge is referring to.
5 posted on 03/29/2012 9:08:09 PM PDT by Seizethecarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Red Steel

The appropriate forum is to show a physical, certified copy in a court of law. Any certified public record is considered “self-authenticating” under the Federal Rules of Evidence, with the idea being that both parties can examine the document and ensure that it contains the required certification elements ... or does not show obvious signs of forgery. As we know, the Kenyan coward, despite claiming to have TWO hard copies of a certified long form refused to show EITHER in the ballot hearing in Georgia ... in fact, he’s not shown them in ANY court of law. Finally, this sounds like a judge who gets it.


7 posted on 03/29/2012 11:09:45 PM PDT by edge919
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson