Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: kabar

“Zimmerman’s judgement is the problem.”

So you were an eye witness?


5 posted on 03/29/2012 2:46:49 PM PDT by Okieshooter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Okieshooter

Did you hear that the enemedia disclosed the name of a THIRTEEN YEAR OLD witness?!


8 posted on 03/29/2012 2:49:48 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (Ich habe keinen Konig aber Gott)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Okieshooter
So you were an eye witness?

No, I am relying on the police who investigated the matter. Until someone proves differently, Zimmerman acted in self-defense based on the police investigation into the matter. I am not questioning Zimmerman's judgment. And there are eyewitnesses to the struggle that took place.

"When the Sanford Police Department arrived at the scene of the incident, Mr. Zimmerman provided a statement claiming he acted in self defense which at the time was supported byphysical evidence and testimony. By Florida Statute, law enforcement was PROHIBITED frommaking an arrest based on the facts and circumstances they had at the time. Additionally, whenany police officer makes an arrest for any reason, the officer MUST swear and affirm that he/sheis making the arrest in good faith and with probable cause. If the arrest is done maliciously andin bad faith, the officer and the City may be held liable. According to Florida Statute 776.032 :776.032

Immunity from criminal prosecution and civil action for justifiable use of force.—

(1)A person who uses force as permitted in s.776.012, s.776.013, or s.776.031is justified in using such force and is immune from criminal prosecution and civil action forthe use of such force, unless the person against whom force was used is a lawenforcement officer, as defined in s.943.10(14), who was acting in the performance of his or her official duties and the officer identified himself or herself in accordance withany applicable law or the person using force knew or reasonably should have known thatthe person was a law enforcement officer. As used in this subsection, the term “criminalprosecution” includes arresting, detaining in custody, and charging or prosecuting thedefendant.

(2)A law enforcement agency may use standard procedures for investigating the use of force as described in subsection (1), but the agency may not arrest the person for usingforce unless it determines that there is probable cause that the force that was used wasunlawful.

10 posted on 03/29/2012 3:02:57 PM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Okieshooter
“Zimmerman’s judgement is the problem.”
22 posted on 03/29/2012 4:24:37 PM PDT by Oztrich Boy (This world is a comedy to those that think, a tragedy to those that feel - Horace Walpole)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson