Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Revolting cat!

“More disinformation from canuckistan. As another poster showed supported by evidence, the encounter was far from Zimmerman’s truck.”

I never said Martin attacked Zimmerman at the truck. I speculated Martin may have attacked Zimmerman on the way back to Zimmerman’s truck. Learn to read.

“There is a national association of Neighbourhood Watch organization with its rules, code of conduct and so on. Zimmerman did not register his, did not follow any code of conduct except his. Proof he didn’t register comes from the interviews with the association.”

Proof?

“Mr Zimmerman’s code of conduct wa agressive and presumptous.”

In your opinion. Again no crime.

“An experienced policeman, at least in this country, identifies himself and attempts to engage the suspect with a friendly conversation.”

Your point? Are we at the point where you prove a crime was committed yet? Btw Martin was running. How was Zimmerman supposed to engage him in conversation?

“D’uh to you and the clueless George who confronted Martin. Wow, what a technique!”

Duh to you for continuing to speculate and accuse with no proof. Nobody said Zimmerman’s actions or technique were perfect. Only that there is no proof he did anything criminal.


129 posted on 03/25/2012 9:04:15 PM PDT by trappedincanuckistan (livefreeordietryin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies ]


To: trappedincanuckistan

You have to win, don’t you? I don’t. A simple Google search will find you an article which recalls an interview with a national neighbourhood watch organization spokesman who says that Zimmerman’s watch was never registered. Google has your proof.

A some point they met, and Zimmerman asked aggressively, as we know: “What are you doing here?” What would you answer? I can guess what Martin said: “Who the eff are you to axe, faggot?!”

That’s where Zimmerman should have identified himself (or even before) and started a friendly conversation. He was, as his 911 call shows, paranoid, prejudicial and presumptuous.

First rule: identify yourself. (Go ahead, judge, tell me again it’s not illegal NOT to identify yourself!)

A young black guy stalked, as he clearly was, by a white or almost white guy, is likely to assume that he is being stalked by a fag on a prowl, believe me! There is a particular distaste for homosexuals among young black males. All of it is conjecture (before you accuse me of fantasies.)


131 posted on 03/25/2012 9:15:34 PM PDT by Revolting cat! (Let us prey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson