but he may have a woman problem.
I have been voting since 1960 and my vote for or against someone never depended on whether they were someone I would ever want to marry. I initially planned to vote for Cain. IMO the economy, jobs, taxes and my personal freedom are way more important than whether a candidate has a past history of screwing around.
That's all well and good, but you seem to be suggesting female voters in general do just that. No doubt it happens that way for some but I don't believe that applies to conservative women of faith at all.
For example, it could be argued that if a candidate will lie, cheat, and betray his wife (of whom he presumably is committed to and loves), why would he not do the same to people he doesn't even know if doing so would satisfy some short term objectives?
You may not agree with that kind of thinking, but it's more logical than looking at a candidate in the context of whether or not he might be 'marriage material’.