[betty boop]

p.s.: PLUS your question — what is the physical mechanism that drives evolution? is simply "stupid" in the first place: For if we cannot say what it is that is doing all this "evolving" in the first place, what is the point of the exercise?

And Darwinism has nothing to say on this point.

JMHO FWIW.

[allmendream]

My question is quite apt. If you believe there is evolution going on - and that there is some physical component to it - a description of that physical component would be ESSENTIAL.

I guess you consider physical descriptions of physical phenomena “stupid” - the rest of the world deems it necessary for any sort of discovery or useful application of the scientific method.

Your inability to answer is quite telling.

More inartful dodging and semantic stupidity doesn't answer my question.

What would be the physical component of the evolution you say you accept?

Could you describe it to us using a non-”Darwinian” argument?

Or are you too conditioned by your creationist indoctrination to ever think outside the paltry limits of your self imposed box enough to think scientifically for even a moment?