Full retreat into the meaning of words is no answer to my rather simple question.
Even if you believe there is more to evolution than JUST a physical mechanism - it seems that you have no earthly idea, nor does it seem that you are willing to speculate, WHAT that physical mechanism IS.
Natural selection - despite your protestations otherwise - is not magical miraculous or metaphysical - it can be describe accurately as a physical result based upon physical phenomena.
You claim to believe in some sort of evolution that has some basis in this physical universe - yet you are entirely incapable of describing it.
When questioned on what should be a rather simple matter - you retreat into semantics and blather about unrelated subjects.
The point is that you claim to accept evolution, claim that it has SOME physical basis - but have no idea what that physical basis is or how it would work or how it would be different than a “Darwinian” explanation.
This is all too typical of creationists.
They don't know what DNA is, or what it does - but they are SURE it can't do what we see it doing without some sort of miraculous intervention!
Quite amusing.
Thanks for posting. :)
You continue to miss my point: the complete description of natural phenomena does not exclusively reside in physical descriptions.
I give up, allmendream. After five years of corresponding with you, I have not achieved one single success in getting you to think "outside the box" of your Darwinist "conditioning."
Plus, how on earth could you possibly digest in about ten minutes, what it took me several hours to write?
Jeepers, you must be a true genius!