Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: betty boop
The chart does nothing to explain the physical basis of the evolution you claim to accept.

It does nothing to differentiate the evolution you claim to believe in from the mechanism Darwin outlined.

So I guess the answer to if you could explain the physical mechanism behind the evolution you claim to believe in is still a resounding “No”.

So how would a population “evolve” via a physical mechanism in the evolution you claim to accept?

Can you explain it in a non-”Darwinian” fashion?

Apparently not.

Very amusing.

214 posted on 03/27/2012 7:35:55 AM PDT by allmendream (Tea Party did not send GOP to DC to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 213 | View Replies ]


To: allmendream
So I guess the answer to if you could explain the physical mechanism behind the evolution you claim to believe in is still a resounding “No”.

Natural selection is not a "physical mechanism."

216 posted on 03/27/2012 7:58:16 AM PDT by betty boop (We are led to believe a lie when we see with, and not through the eye. — William Blake)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 214 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson