Replies

Do you hate evolution with a passion, yet?

Have you lost your mind?

Evolution exists, like the law of gravity. And just like the law of gravity, you can't apply it as the cause of everything. But it does exist.

Selective breeding is a good example, whether in animals, plants, or humans - some traits are preserved and extended, some traits are not. These are facts. It doesn't mean you have to believe there's no Creator. You just have to apply things properly.

"Hating" a law of nature, a fact seen a billion times a day around us, is idiotic.

And BTW, the woman in the video was obviously mentally deranged before evolution ever got into the picture. She seemed just as likely to go off because of the color the walls were painted, as evolution. Get a grip.

Evolution exists, like the law of gravity.

Evolution is a HYPOTHESIS which has never been tested and cannot be tested or confirmed pursuant to the Scientific Method.

Evolution is not a theory, in the technical sense. It is not a law.

Evolution is a HYPOTHESIS which is put forward to try to explain the observable world.

But to make it remotely scientific, the evolutionary hypothesis must be TESTED by a repeatable experiment under controlled conditions which is capable of proving or disproving the hypothesis. Experiments must then be REPEATED under varying conditions by various neutral and independent researchers at different locations.

Remember cold fusion? Cold fusion was "proven" as a cheap, clean, limitless energy source by laboratory experiments in Utah. But nobody could reproduce those results anywhere else in any other laboratory. This produced whispers (unfairly) of fraud or deceit.

The evolutionary hypothesis not only has not ever been tested, but it is of course incapable of being tested. Even if we found life on another planet, that would not tell us where life came from on Earth.

The very first things that we learn about science -- and then promptly forget -- is the LIMITATIONS of science and the unprovable assumptions on which scientific analysis is based. There are some things that science can do and somethings it simply cannot. Science is simply not valid outside of its zone of competence.

THE PROBLEM IS that evolutionists refuse to DEFINE what evolution is.

We can very simply "prove" that evolution has never been proven: Evolutionists refuse to DEFINE it.

How can you "prove" something you have never defined?

Evolutionists flip flop around like a freshly-caught fish on a dock, between ORIGIN Of life, DRIFT within species, never-proven transitions BETWEEN species, or just the existence of species that are now longer living.

When evolution is discussed, evolutionists CHANGE CHANNELS RAPIDLY between these different concepts of evolution, yet claim that it has been proven.

"Hating" a law of nature, a fact seen a billion times a day around us, is idiotic.

Thanks for your clear and concise refutation of the author's argument!

What, after all, could be sillier than attacking a scientific explanation for an observed natural phenomenon merely because it causes some people to suffer self-esteem issues?

Regards,

Selective breeding is a good example".....

Of evolution? I suppose it depends on what you mean by evolution. Creationists don't have a problem with selective breeding but if you start with dogs, no matter how many generations you selectively breed, you still end up with a dog. Now if you could selectively breed to the point where you end up with something other than a dog, I'll be impressed.