Skip to comments.
Fluke on Maher's Attack on Palin:'I'm Not Going to SpeakAbout Particular LabelsThat Have Been
Cybercast News Service ^
| 3/21/12
| Elizabeth Harrington
Posted on 03/21/2012 3:59:31 PM PDT by Nachum
While generally condemning the use of "demeaning language" used against women in public life, Georgetown Law student Sandra Fluke declined to comment on Bill Maher's used of vulgar terms to describe former Republican vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin. (Snip) After she spoke, CNSNews.com asked Fluke: “You said we shouldn’t tolerate demeaning language for women. Should we tolerate Bill Maher for calling Sarah Palin some of the stuff he’s said?” Fluke responded: “I’m not going to speak about particular labels that have been applied to particular women. But no matter who is demeaning women, it’s always unacceptable.”
(Excerpt) Read more at cnsnews.com ...
TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: fluke; labels; maher; palin
Full title: Fluke on Maher's Attack on Palin: 'I'm Not Going to Speak About Particular Labels That Have Been Applied to Particular Women'
1
posted on
03/21/2012 3:59:42 PM PDT
by
Nachum
To: Nachum
But no matter who is demeaning women, it’s always unacceptable.”
I agree. Especially when it’s sluts that are demeaning themselves.
2
posted on
03/21/2012 4:04:24 PM PDT
by
freedomfiter2
(Brutal acts of commission and yawning acts of omission both strengthen the hand of the devil.)
To: freedomfiter2
"All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others." "Four legs good! Two legs better!"
3
posted on
03/21/2012 4:08:03 PM PDT
by
rarestia
(It's time to water the Tree of Liberty.)
To: Nachum
What Fluke said: “I’m not going to speak about particular labels that have been applied to particular women."
What Fluke meant: “I’m not going to speak about particular labels that have been applied to conservative women."
4
posted on
03/21/2012 4:10:01 PM PDT
by
Leaning Right
(Why am I carrying this lantern? you ask. I am looking for the next Reagan.)
To: Nachum
Fluke responded: “I’m not going to speak That good, 'cause I'm not gonna listen.
Beat it, Butch. Your 15 minutes are up.
5
posted on
03/21/2012 4:11:21 PM PDT
by
skeeter
To: Nachum
She probably could be President.
The lib press would cover for her.
She just has to wait until there is a fresh bunch of clueless 18-34 y/o to enthusastically vote for her because she is a women..and that would be historic!
6
posted on
03/21/2012 4:16:42 PM PDT
by
Leep
(Dueling tag lines=don't worry,you'll be a vegetable guy soon<>It's gonna be a Newt day!)
To: Nachum
But no matter who is demeaning women, it’s always unacceptable.”
Unless its accompanied by at least one million dollars to ease the discomfort.
7
posted on
03/21/2012 4:21:29 PM PDT
by
Don Corleone
("Oil the gun..eat the cannoli. Take it to the Mattress.")
To: rarestia
"All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others."
"Four legs good! Two legs better!"
Spreading your two legs and getting everyone else to pay for your fun or to kill the unwanted offspring is better yet.
The pigs on Animal Farm never got castrated, and this sow wants the same fun without the piglets.
8
posted on
03/21/2012 4:22:45 PM PDT
by
rmlew
("Mosques are our barracks, minarets our bayonets, domes our helmets, the believers our soldiers.")
To: Nachum
Another example of what total frauds liberals are. They really have no morals at all other than advancing statism.
9
posted on
03/24/2012 12:22:51 PM PDT
by
fkabuckeyesrule
(Lets institute SARAH-ia law in America!)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson