Phil Berg, (who INITIALLY raised this issue) was also a Democrat, a Hillary (sp) supporter. It’s not surprising, politicians always eat their own.
the way to succeed? Make obama the plaintiff ... as long as he is the defendant these lose.
(Hint: needed to kick obambi off of one ballot, primary or general and force him to go to court and prove his case.)
Not one state has done this thing correctly. What does that say about how much support out there?
ping to WND article on Larry Klayman FL challenge...
Too little, too late.
Historians of the future will scratch their heads in astonishment that America allowed itself to be bamboozled by a demented racialist poseur and con artist who was never qualified to hold the office.
As one will say!
” Very Interesting! and a Huge Ray of Hope for America and the Freedoms We cherish and honor in America!”
As one will say!
” Very Interesting! and a Huge Ray of Hope for America and the Freedoms We cherish and honor in America!”
However...the PayPal button is on duty...24/7.
Help us Larry Klayman...you're our next new last false hope.
2. He seem to question the sheriff's claim that Obama’s long form birth certificate is a fake.
3. He talked about how an employee at his company used his own Arizona birth certificate to run through the company's special scanner-—it supposedly is much better than consumer type scanners that the sheriff might have used, according to Colburn-—and the employee discovered that his original birth certificate showed at least 40 layers.
4. Colburn’s point seems to be: If the sheriff was pointing to the fact that Obama’s long form birth certificate had many layers in order to prove that it was a fake, then the sheriff could be wrong, because his employee's original certificate-—it is displayed during the tv interview-—also showed many layers-—at least 40-—when it was scanned.
5. I'm no scanner or computer expert, so if someone here could explain where Colburn is wrong or right, please let me know. Thanks.
the birth certificate is only ONE part of being classified a natural born citizen
to be considered a ‘natural born citizen’, as per the US Supreme court ruling minor v happersett (1874), the person must be born on US soil AS WELL AS be born to TWO citizen parents
and that’s the catch. 0bama has never denied his father was kenyan, a british subject. this is why the birth certificate is being offered up like a red herring to distract everyone.
the only thing the birth certificate COULD prove would be location of birth. his PARENTAGE is an entirely separate issue.
at BEST, 0bama is a US citizen... but there is NO WAY he is a natural born citizen
DEMAND your congress critter explain how someone that is a US citizen as well as ‘british by descent’ (which means you can pick up your british passport anytime you’d like) can possibly be a natural born citizen
if he were 30 we wouldn’t let him on the ballot. why is this any different?
Quit posting nearly everything in Frontpage