“Newt is staying in for a good reason, not because he is just stubborn, but because without him, Romney would win the nomination sooner if just Santorum were in the race.”
Herein lies what makes no sense. Sooner, later? What difference is there if the outcome is the same? To be honest FRiend, running a good campaign and being in the top two of contenders when the money and odds are against you, shows a high level of competence. It isn’t perfect, but quite a feat.
I always argue with those that feel they have nothing to learn. I argue with Tokyo Rove. He has made a lifetime out of Political Science. If I don’t argue with him, I will have to accept that he is correct and Romney is inevitable.
There are always reasons for why someone who should do well isn’t doing well. But it can’t be corrected without taking a look at what that is.
I think Newt is smart, but Newt isn’t wise. Something in him gets in the way of that. I won’t say what that may be because I am going to refrain from being nasty as I promised another here yesterday that I was going to stop it.
So, pray tell, who do you see as wise enough?