To: Jonty30
And this is why he would lose the election. He just cannot help but substitute his personal agenda for the good of the nation.
Is it his personal agenda or as some Freepers claim, his support of big government?
Because getting the government involved in censoring and filtering what we do on the internet would require more government bureaucracy, which leads to, you guessed it, more Big Government!
It does make you wonder though, because anybody who is not functionally brain dead knows that if the government got in the habit of censoring what we do on the internet, they would not stop with porn. Rick Santorum is smart enough to know he'd be opening the door for future liberal administrations to go even further, so you have to wonder.
To: af_vet_rr
anybody who is not functionally brain dead knows that if the government got in the habit of censoring what we do on the internet, they would not stop with porn.
Exactly. How difficult would it be for a future Democrat administration to label THIS place as "obscene"?
To: af_vet_rr
Because getting the government involved in censoring and filtering what we do on the internet would require more government bureaucracy, which leads to, you guessed it, more Big Government! So would putting more border agents on the Mexican border. Would you object to that? Or should greater efforts be taken to enforce the laws of the land?
225 posted on
03/15/2012 3:44:29 PM PDT by
Kazan
(Mitt Romney: The greater of two evils)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson