Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

This was copied verbatim in full text from the Right Michigan and Republican Michigander blogs with permission of the author who is a political consultant and a friend of mine. After referencing this piece a few times in the face of claims by Romney supporting Santorum haters both here and elsewhere that Santorum competed in Michigan and won Alabama/Mississippi because of democrats, I asked Dan if I could post this here. He obliged as long as it wasn't edited.

If you have a problem with his story, he'll be happy to defend it on his site or on Right Michigan in the comments section.

I believe the claims that are made here after looking at some of his sources used with the election results compared with the results in previous general elections. Santorum's votes are coming from Repubicans, not democrats, regardless of what CNN says.

1 posted on 03/14/2012 9:09:55 PM PDT by Darren McCarty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: 21twelve; Absolutely Nobama; AFPhys; afraidfortherepublic; AmericanInTokyo; ...
Santorum for President Ping List.

FReepmail “Antoninus” to be added or removed.

2 posted on 03/14/2012 9:11:43 PM PDT by Lazlo in PA (Now living in a newly minted Red State.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Darren McCarty

They asked for party affiliation before handing over the ballot, explaining that Dems could not vote for Rep Pres candidates. The Dems could only vote for local items. My question is, once in the booth, how do they know if they did or didn’t vote for the Rep candidate if they were Dems?


3 posted on 03/14/2012 10:03:18 PM PDT by Netizen (Path to citizenship = Scamnesty. If you give it away, more will come. Who's pilfering your wallet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Darren McCarty

The last person on earth who should be complaining about cross overs is Mitt Romney. He and his GOP-E liberal friends wanted open primaries to keep conservatives from winning too many delegates. This fix was supposed to give them a candidate who was more acceptable to independents.

Looks like unintended consequences rips Mitt’s best laid plans to shreds.

But one fix was more successful for Mitt. Most of the winner take all primaries are in liberal states. All the conservative Southern states are proportional contests. Mitt makes out like a sleazy fat rat again. Yes, the fix is in.


6 posted on 03/15/2012 1:01:48 AM PDT by Waryone (Mitt Romney, dangerous homosexualist and lying socialist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Springman; sergeantdave; cyclotic; netmilsmom; RatsDawg; PGalt; FreedomHammer; queenkathy; ...
Like grellis I'm going to try to avoid pinging you to blogs but I felt that this one was worth a ping.

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us
7 posted on 03/15/2012 3:23:22 AM PDT by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Darren McCarty

Too bad the Dems weren’t that organized in Michigan. If it takes the Dems to help us nominate our strongest candidate (Santorum, of course), then more power to them.


10 posted on 03/15/2012 4:25:42 AM PDT by BobL (I don't care about his past - Santorum will BRING THE FIGHT to Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson