I have wondered about the clan accepting Zero, since they must have know he was NOT the son of the Kenyan, since the real son of the Kenyan had lived around at least some of them, looked like the Kenyan, and Zero looks nothing like him. Do they really think Zero is the real BHO or was it money talking?
Ah, I didn’t know the real birthdate for the real BHO had been discovered; fits perfectly in with Mary’s memory.
World Bank, they had to give him stuff to shut him up, I suppose.
The ‘real birthday’ for BHO2 hasn’t been ‘discovered’, it’s just the date that popped up on the Search conducted by the PI.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/23617671/BARNETT-v-OBAMA-Exhibit-Barack-Obama-Background-Report
It’s either a birthday for zero written as 8/1/61 in the USA fashion, or it’s a birthday for the man from Equatorial Guinea, written in the european fashion - which would make it JANUARY 8, 1961.
I naturally wondered about that myself, remember 'auntie' Zeituni saying that she was there when the letter arrived from the kenyan in Hawaii, to say that he had a son? It would be helpful to know the date on which that letter arrived in the village...Onyango, the only member of the clan who could read, would have read the letter our to the extended family... And when Stanley Ann and zero arrived in the village to introduce themselves, in 1983, according to a member of the clan in Kogelo, all she would have had to say is 'here we are, the white woman he married in Hawaii, and this is our son...' But that would only work if the dark boy had remained with his father and Ruth in Nairobi, and the villagers never knew who he was, in which case Malik would not have provided the revelation that he remembers playing with BHO2 when they both were boys...so what further lies remain to be uncovered?