Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: little jeremiah
... and was therefore born with the name BHO, why would there have been any need to fabricate a forgery?

Very astute question. We are shown here how easy it is for a foreign born child to obtain a certification of live birth in Hawaii. Even the name of the parents need not be right, and where the mother gave birth need not be shown apparently...neither is any confirmation from a delivering doctor or midwife required...all she had to do was make a statement she had resided in one place in Hawaii for a certain period of time.

A father? Just fill in the appropriate line, and there you have it. 'Proof' of birth in Hawaii on any date you wish to name.

So why the need for a fake? I have an idea...it's got to have something to do with the 'application' lodged on the same date as the birth/death announcement for Virginia Sunahara appeared in the Hawaii papers, it's got to have something to do with a birth certificate for Virginia that would show the same number as zero is using...and the fact that who-ever lodged that application showed his birthplace as Kenya.

Why Kenya? Kenya was a ruse. Because if we could now see the overseas airline arrivals between August 1, 1961 and August 9, 1961, we would see the real names of his parents (or discover who brought him into the US) and discover what country he really came from. His name wasn't BHO2 until after he landed at that airport.

28 posted on 03/13/2012 4:52:16 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (FAIR DINKUM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: Fred Nerks

So it looks as though Virginia’s number was stolen shortly after her birth, right around when the child known now as BHO arrived in the US...but did he arrive in HI at that time? Or were people in HI arranging the papers before he even was brought there?

(Regarding our discussion on a recent thread):

If the child now known as BHO didn’t entered the USin the first week of Aug. 1961, and then shortly arrived in HI...then where was the photo of the two boys (one darker and one lighter) taken, must have been in HI.

UNLESS - the form you copied above with Madelyn spelled wrong - that one we’ve seen before, that now seems to fit into place - was filled out WITHOUT Zero even being in the state of HI yet?


54 posted on 03/13/2012 7:13:49 PM PDT by little jeremiah (We will have to go through hell to get out of hell. Signed, a fanatic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

To: Fred Nerks

Oops, correcting one sentence:

If the child now known as BHO entered the US in the first week of Aug. 1961....

‘Nother question. Where was the dark boy born, any ideas? What kind of BC did HE start off with?


55 posted on 03/13/2012 7:20:31 PM PDT by little jeremiah (We will have to go through hell to get out of hell. Signed, a fanatic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

To: LucyT; Fred Nerks; little jeremiah; Fractal Trader
ping to extensive discussion between Fred Nerks and Little Jeremiah fleshing out an alternate “narrative” that Barry is not who he claims to be and the identities of the two little boys (dark and light) and where and when that family picture with BHO Sr. and Ruth was taken. I disagree, but as there is no reliable BC for Barry we don't know, yet, who he is and who his parents were.

FN Comments 28, 59, 60, 62, 64, 69, 80, 84, 88

92 posted on 03/14/2012 7:52:19 AM PDT by Seizethecarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson