I remember seeing the original of this LFBC with all of the information filled in including the signatures the features of which are still peeking out from under the white-out tape. The forger of the Blaine BC filled in the BHO related info and also forged security paper to fill in the whited-out areas.
The person who allowed their BC to be put up may have changed their mind, as it invited identity theft.
« Editorial: Oct. 19, 2009 »The Blaine Document
October 19, 2009 by John Charlton
WILLIAM BLAINE RELEASES PURPORTED OBAMA CERTIFICATE OF LIVE BIRTH
by John Charlton
(Oct. 20, 2009) — At 10:22 PM Last evening someone purporting to be William Blaine issued the following email:
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 22:15:27 -0400
Subject: Obama Birth Proof
+ Cert.pdf
My client has asked me to share this with you and asks that you share it with as many patriots as possible so that it cannot be scrubbed from existance.
I trust you will know what to do with this.
http://thepostnemail.wordpress.com/2009/10/19/the-blaine-document/
I have been referring to what you call the BLAINE DOCUMENT as ‘the application’ - now which came first, the item with the names removed (of which artifacts remain) OR THE ABOVE?
Disclaimer: I have no further information than anyone else has - if this item is genuine or fake, I have no idea. It’s just another piece of the puzzle. But this much I can say, the date coincides with the birth/death announcement of Virginia, and Madelyn did not create this forgery, unless she didn’t know how to spell her own name, or the name of the street.
But it sure does LOOK LIKE ‘per grandmother’ attempted to obtain a CERTIFICATION OF LIVE BIRTH sometime in 1982 on the strength of this document being FILED.
And now we are getting somewhere...the date on the article you quoted was June 10, 2009.
The Post and E-Mail article was on October 19, 2009.
The earlier item without names, just artifacts, had a background of security paper.
The ‘Blaine document’ was on a plain background...and I think I can see why...when the names were removed on the original, much of the security background detail would have been damaged.